Blog

The S&P 500 Death Cross – Time to Panic?

  • At the end of August 2015 the 50-day moving average of the S&P500 crossed its 200-day moving average to the downside – the 33rd occurrence of a “Death Cross” since 1950.
  • The performance of the S&P500 was investigated for periods ranging from one year before to two years after a Death Cross.
  • During the last 65 years there were ten recessions. A Death Cross preceded six recessions and occurred early in four recessions.
  • After a Death Cross the probability of S&P500 being lower than for any other point in time increases for periods from one- to eighteen months.

Posted in blogs, featured, Publish | 8 Comments

Better Returns from Exchange Traded Funds with iM’s Market Climate Grader

  • The Market Climate Grader divides the environment for investment returns into four market climate zones.
  • For better returns one should adjust asset allocation according to market climate. As an example, three models were analyzed to highlight the better performance when investing according to market climate.
  • Performance for three models which use ETFs with varying risk characteristics are shown. Interestingly, risk measurements for the models are very similar, better than for the benchmarks and component ETFs.
  • The simulated performance for all models is much higher than for buy-and-hold of the S&P500 or for the Vanguard LifeStrategy Moderate Growth Fund which holds 60% stocks and 40% bonds.

Posted in blogs, featured | 30 Comments

The Unemployment Rate is Not Signaling a Recession: Update September 4, 2015

A reliable source for recession forecasting is the unemployment rate, which can provide signals for the beginnings and ends of recessions. The unemployment rate model (article link), updated with the August figure of 5.1%, does not signal a recession now.
Read more >

Posted in blogs, Publish, UER | Leave a comment

Assessing Market Climate with iM’s Market Climate Grader (Update 9/6/15)

  • The market environment for investment returns is divided into four climate zones.
  • Market climate zones were determined by combining fundamental and technical indicators.
  • A performance analysis of SPY shows that the probability of stock market gains is highest for climate Zone-1 and lowest for Zone-4.

Posted in blogs, featured, Publish | 18 Comments

Avoiding Stock Market Crashes with the Hi-Lo Index of the S&P500

  • This daily indicator is calculated as the ratio of the number of S&P500 stocks that have reached new 3-month-highs minus those that have reached new 3-month-lows, divided 500.
  • Exiting and entering the stock market according the indicator’s signals would have avoided major drawdowns of the market during the backtest period from Jan-2000 to Aug-2015.
  • Switching according to the signals between stock ETFs and the Intermediate Treasury Bond ETF IEF would have produced much higher returns and lower drawdowns than buy-and-hold of the stock ETFs.

Posted in blogs, featured, Publish | 25 Comments

The Unemployment Rate is Not Signaling a Recession: Update August 7, 2015

A reliable source for recession forecasting is the unemployment rate, which can provide signals for the beginnings and ends of recessions. The unemployment rate model (article link), updated with the July figure of 5.3%, does not signal a recession now.
Read more >

Posted in blogs, Publish, UER | Leave a comment

Best2x4(S&P500 Min-Volatility) Variable Asset System with Minimum Volatility Stocks of the S&P 500

  • This model can hold 2 to 8 stocks, at variable weightings, selected by a ranking system from a minimum volatility stock universe of the S&P500.
  • The model has 8 equally weighted slots; a very high ranked stock could occupy a maximum of 4 slots, that is a nominal 50% weighting of the model’s total assets.
  • When adverse stock market conditions exist, the model reduces stock holdings by 50% and invests the proceeds in the -2x leveraged ProShares UltraShort S&P500 ETF (SDS).
  • The backtest produced a simulated average annual return of about 42% from Jan-2000 to end of June-2015 with a maximum draw-down of minus 19%.

Posted in blogs | Tagged , | 14 Comments

Best(S&P1500) rev1

  • This model can hold 10 stocks selected by a ranking system from a minimum volatility stock universe of the S&P 1500.
  • When adverse stock market conditions exist, the model reduces stock holdings by 50% and invests the proceeds in the -2x leveraged ProShares UltraShort S&P500 ETF (SDS).
  • The backtest produced a simulated average annual return of about 42% from Jan-2000 to end of June-2015 with a maximum draw-down of minus 24%.

Posted in blogs | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Best3x4(S&P500 Min-Volatility) Variable Asset System with Minimum Volatility Stocks of the S&P 500

  • This model can hold 3 to 12 stocks, at variable weightings, selected by a ranking system from a minimum volatility stock universe of the S&P500.
  • The model has 12 equally weighted slots; a very high ranked stock could occupy a maximum of 4 slots, that is a nominal 33% weighting of the model’s total assets.
  • When adverse stock market conditions exist, the model reduces stock holdings by 35% and invests the proceeds in the -2x leveraged ProShares UltraShort S&P500 ETF (SDS).
  • The backtest produced a simulated average annual return of about 36% from Jan-2000 to end of June-2015 with a maximum draw-down of minus 22%.

Posted in blogs, featured, Publish | Tagged , | 11 Comments

Estimating Market Direction and Long-Term Returns with a 35-Year Moving Average of Robert Shiller’s P/E10

  • The long-term mean of the Shiller Cyclically Adjusted Price to Earnings Ratio P/E10 incorporates time-inconsistent data, causing substantial underprediction of realized stock returns in recent decades.
  • Better prediction of market direction and returns can be achieved by using a 35-year moving-average of P/E10, instead of its long-term mean.
  • Stocks seem only overvalued after P/E10 becomes greater than its 35-year moving average plus 7.5 added to it, with major market declines starting one to five years thereafter.
  • An analysis shows that whenever P/E10 rose from below to above its 35-year moving average significant ten-year gains for stocks followed.
  • Both the historic market trend, and the current level of the Shiller CAPE P/E10, suggest probable real market gains of about 20% to 28% to the end of 2020.

Posted in blogs, edit, featured, Publish | Tagged | 5 Comments

The Unemployment Rate is Not Signaling a Recession: Update July 3, 2015

A reliable source for recession forecasting is the unemployment rate, which can provide signals for the beginnings and ends of recessions. The unemployment rate model (article link), updated with the June figure of 5.3%, does not signal a recession now.
Read more >

Posted in blogs, Publish, UER | Leave a comment

Minimum Volatility Stocks: Does Frequent Trading Result in Better Returns?

  • Two trading models are compared which select periodically 8 large-cap minimum volatility stocks from the Health Care, Consumer Staples, and Utilities sectors of the S&P 500.
  • The models only differ from each other with regard to hedging, and sell rules which extend stock holding periods for one model to longer than one year.
  • Backtests over a 15.5 year period show similar average annualized returns of about 36% for both models, but the number of realized trades differ, 148 versus 618.
  • The analysis shows that in this case, and perhaps in general, frequently trading minimum volatility stocks does not necessarily produce better returns than for one year minimum holding periods.

Posted in blogs, featured, Publish | Tagged | 1 Comment

Best8(S&P500 Min-Volatility)-Tax Efficient Large-Cap Portfolio Management System With Minimum Volatility Stocks of the S&P 500

  • This model invests periodically in eight highly liquid large-cap stocks selected from those considered to be minimum volatility stocks of S&P 500 Index.
  • Most stock positions are held for longer than one year resulting in a Tax Efficiency ratio of 81.4%.
  • When adverse stock market conditions exist the model shorts the 3x leveraged Ultrapro S&P500 ETF (UPRO) – hedge/current holding ratio= 45%.
  • It produced a simulated average annual return of about 36% from Jan-2000 to end of June-2015.

Posted in blogs, featured, Publish | Tagged , | 37 Comments

Minimum Volatility Stocks: 1 year Out-Of-Sample Performance of iM’s Best12(USMV) Models

  • Portfolios of the 12 top ranked stocks of the iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ETF provided much higher 1-year returns than the ETF.
  • For the period 6/30/14 to 6/18/15, our Best12(USMV)Q3-Investor, a 1-year buy&hold portfolio, returned 26.0%,
  • The Best12(USMV)-Trader, re-balanced every 2 weeks, returned 29.3%,
  • iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ETF USMV returned 13.3% for the same period..

Posted in blogs, featured, Publish | Tagged , | 4 Comments

The Unemployment Rate is Not Signaling a Recession: Update June 5, 2015

A reliable source for recession forecasting is the unemployment rate, which can provide signals for the beginnings and ends of recessions. The unemployment rate model (article link), updated with the May figure of 5.5%, does not signal a recession now.
Read more >

Posted in blogs, Publish, UER | Leave a comment

The Forward Rate Ratio: Predictor Of An Ongoing Stock Bull- And Bond Bear-Market

  • Prior to recession the yield curve becomes inverted, as indicated by the Forward Rate Ratio between the 2-year and 10-year U.S. Treasury yields (FRR2-10) being less than 1.00.
  • The FRR2-10 has recently peaked at about 1.20 signifying that US economic activity is in the expansion phase of the business cycle, far away from the next recession, with ongoing gains for the stock market predicted.
  • Typically after peaks of FRR2-10 the yield of 10-year Treasuries rises, signaling a bond bear-market.
  • When FRR2-10 falls to near 1.00 the transition from expansion to boom occurs. The average lead time after FRR2-10 becomes less than 1.00 to the subsequent recession start was 14 months for the last seven recession.

Posted in blogs, featured, Publish | Tagged | 1 Comment

The Forward Rate Ratio: A Long Leading Recession Indicator

  • Prior to recession the yield curve becomes inverted, as indicated by the Forward Rate Ratio between the 2-year and 10-year U.S. Treasury yields (FRR2-10) being less than 1.00.
  • Currently the FRR2-10 is about 1.20 signifying that US economic activity is in the expansion phase of the business cycle, far away from the next recession.
  • When FRR2-10 falls to near 1.00 the transition from expansion to boom occurs. For the last seven recessions the average lead time after FRR2-10 becomes less than 1.00 was 14 months.

Posted in blogs | Tagged | 3 Comments

The Unemployment Rate is Not Signaling a Recession: Update May 8, 2015

A reliable source for recession forecasting is the unemployment rate, which can provide signals for the beginnings and ends of recessions. The unemployment rate model (article link), updated with the April figure of 5.4%, does not signal a recession now.
Read more >

Posted in blogs, Publish, UER | Leave a comment

There is no reason why the Fed should increase the Federal Funds Rate any time soon – Update April 2015

  • The Trade Weighted US Dollar Index has been growing since Q4 2011. Its growth increasing over the last nine months.
  • The annual rise in CPI is below 2%, and the US economy remains relatively weak.
  • The US Market is attracting foreign capital that is fleeing their local currency devaluation.
  • There is no reason for the Fed to increase interest rates under these conditions.
  • Interest rates will probably rise only once the dollar reverses its gains.

Posted in blogs, featured | Tagged | 1 Comment

The Unemployment Rate is Not Signaling a Recession: Update April 4, 2015

A reliable source for recession forecasting is the unemployment rate, which can provide signals for the beginnings and ends of recessions. The unemployment rate model (article link), updated with the March figure of 5.5%, does not signal a recession now.
Read more >

Posted in blogs, Publish, UER | Leave a comment
Featured Posts

iM-DrawdownShield

  • New Model – Coming Soon
  • A fully technical S&P 500 market timer using a novel three-horizon trend analysis to identify sustained market movements, reduce exposure during declining markets and participate in rising markets — with relatively infrequent trading.
  • Investing in the stock market can deliver attractive long-term returns, but major market crashes can wipe out years of gains.
  • The challenge is not simply to make money in rising markets, but to protect your capital when markets turn down.
  • The iM-DrawdownShieldis designed to do both. It follows the S&P 500 during favourable market conditions and switches to defensive investments when the risk of a sustained decline increases. Its objective is to reduce major losses without sacrificing long-term investment performance.
  • In a historical simulation covering 1995–2026, the S&P 500 ETF (SPY) experienced a maximum drawdown of 55.2%. The model’s dynamically selected Treasury ETF strategy reduced this to 19.6%, while achieving an annualised return of 12.1%, compared with 11.0% for SPY.

Stocks Are Overvalued, Expect Losses And Low 10-Year Forward Returns: Update October 2025

  • The S&P 500 averaged 6,736 for October 2025, 2,604 points above its long-term trend of 4,132, implying a 39% decline to reach the trend and signifying a valuation substantially above historic norm.
  • The long-term trend indicates a forward 10-year annualized real return of only 1.4%, while the CAPE-MA35 methodology derived 10-year annualized real return is also modest at about 4.3%, indicating limited long-term upside.
  • The short-term outlook indicated by CAPE-MA35 Neutral phase has historically yielded low short-term returns.

The iM CAPE-MA35 ETF Rotation Strategy with 4 ETFs

  • This is a dynamic ETF allocation strategy using the CAPE-MA35 ratio—the Shiller CAPE divided by its 35-year moving average—to identify market phases and adjust portfolio exposure.
  • The model defines four primary phases with respective ETFs—Growth (QQQ), Defensive (GLD, XLU), Uptrend (QQQ, XLE), and Downtrend (GLD)—based on the trend and relative valuation of CAPE-MA35. ETF allocations are adjusted monthly in response to these phases.
  • Backtesting from 1999 to 2025 shows the model outperforms SPY with 20.1% annualized returns, lower drawdowns, and consistent long-term performance with low turnover.
  • The strategy offers a practical, rules-based approach to market timing, blending long-term valuation with trend analysis for superior risk-adjusted returns.

Dynamic ETF Allocation Using CAPE-MA35: A Market Timing Framework Based on the Shiller CAPE

  • This study presents a rules-based ETF allocation model that uses the CAPE-MA35 ratio—the Shiller CAPE divided by its 35-year moving average—to identify distinct market phases and dynamically adjust portfolio exposure.
  • The model defines four primary phases—Growth, Defensive, Uptrend, and Downtrend—based on the trend and relative valuation of CAPE-MA35. ETF allocations are adjusted monthly in response to these phases.

Stocks Are Still Overvalued Despite Recent Significant Declines, Expect Further Losses, But Modest 10-Year Forward Returns: Update April 2025

  • The average of S&P 500 for March 2025 was 5,680, declining to 5,074 by April 4, 2025 (now 13% up from Jul-2023 average of 4,497 when forward returns for stocks “looked reasonably good” according to this analysis).
  • The S&P 500 is still 1,140 points higher than the corresponding long-term trend value of 3,934 for April 2025.
  • For the S&P 500 to reach the corresponding long-trend value would entail a 22% decline from the April 4, 2025 value, indicating that the S&P 500 is still considerably overvalued.
  • Assuming that the current S&P 500 value remains unchanged until the end of April, then the CAPE-ratio would be 31.0, 15% higher than its 35-year moving average (MA35), currently at 26.9.
  • The long-term trend indicates a forward 10-year annualized real return of 4.0%, while the CAPE-MA35 methodology derived 10-year annualized real return is better at about 6.7%.

With reference to Section 202(a)(11)(D) of the Investment Advisers Act: We are Engineers and not Investment Advisers, read more ...
By the mere act of reading this page and navigating this site you acknowledge, agree to, and abide by the Terms of Use / Disclaimer