iM-DrawdownShield

The SPY–BIL model holds the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) or, when it is out of the market, an escape asset. The decision is taken each day by a fixed, published rule computed from SPY’s adjusted closing prices and volume alone. Three bull–bear values (short, medium, long term) on a scale of −10 to +10 are calculated together with their slopes, the buy–sell values. The model leaves SPY when all three slopes are sufficiently negative and returns when all three are sufficiently positive; the thresholds depend on how bullish or bearish each term currently is. Three escape assets are analysed: T-bills (BIL), the highest bull-rated Treasury ETF of SHY, IEF and TLT, and gold (GLD).

Each evening the model publishes the SPY closing price that would trigger a switch on the next day; the switch is executed at the close of the day on which that price is crossed. A text message alerts subscribers when that price lies within 2.5% of the close; a signal that arrives without such an alert is executed at the next day’s close.

How iM-DrawdownShield works     Model Backtest, 1995--2026     Live Model, 1/2/2020--Now

Historical results (hypothetical)

iM-DrawdownShield holds the S&P 500 ETF (SPY) or, when its published rule signals an exit, an escape asset. Two escape choices are shown here:

  • Cash: 1–3 month T-bills (BIL).
  • Best ETF: on the exit day, the highest bull-rated of the Treasury ETFs SHY, IEF and TLT, held until the model re-enters SPY; T-bills if none of the three is rated bullish.

All figures run from February 9, 1995 to October 30, 2026. Trades are executed at the close of the day on which the switching price published the previous evening is crossed. A signal that arrives without a prior alert is executed at the next day’s close.

$10,000 in SPY, buy and hold
$271,858
$10,000 in iM-DrawdownShield, Cash
$414,338
$10,000 in iM-DrawdownShield, Best ETF
$501,339

Returns and deepest falls

Return per yearDeepest fall
PeriodSPYCashBest ETFSPYCashBest ETF
3 years23.320.921.2−18.8−10.0−10.1
5 years12.313.313.5−24.5−12.9−12.9
10 years15.316.216.5−33.7−13.1−12.9
1995–202611.012.513.2−55.2−25.1−19.0
In-sample 2002–20198.010.010.6−55.2−17.1−17.6
Out-of-sample 1995–200115.214.916.0−35.5−19.0−19.0
Out-of-sample 2020–202614.916.917.2−33.7−13.1−12.9

Per cent. 60 switches in total, 1.9 per year; time in SPY 84%; median spell in SPY 124 trading days, out of SPY 33. The rule’s constants were set on 2002–2019 only; 1995–2001 and 2020–2026 were held back.

Risk-adjusted measures

Sharpe ratioBeta to SPYAlpha per year
PeriodSPYCashBest ETFCashBest ETFCashBest ETF
1 year0.600.600.601.001.00+0.0+0.0
3 years1.171.251.270.650.65+3.9+4.2
5 years0.550.730.740.590.59+4.1+4.3
10 years0.751.041.060.530.52+6.4+6.8
1995–20260.520.770.810.500.49+5.4+6.1
In-sample 2002–20190.440.750.790.420.40+5.6+6.3
Out-of-sample 1995–20010.580.640.700.700.70+2.4+3.5
Out-of-sample 2020–20260.660.981.000.500.50+7.3+7.6

All measures on daily returns in excess of T-bills (BIL). Alpha in per cent per year against SPY, whose beta is 1 and alpha 0 by definition. Over the last year the model was in SPY throughout, so its figures equal SPY’s. Sortino ratio 1995–2026: SPY 0.74, Cash 1.08, Best ETF 1.14.

Major declines, SPY peak to trough

DeclineDatesSPYCashBest ETF
Asian/LTCM crisis7/17/98 – 10/8/98−18.2−15.2−14.0
Dot-com bear3/24/00 – 10/9/02−47.5−13.3−5.4
Global financial crisis10/9/07 – 3/9/09−55.2−14.1−9.2
2011 debt ceiling4/29/11 – 10/3/11−18.6−11.6−11.5
2015–16 slowdown5/21/15 – 2/11/16−13.0−11.4−7.2
Q4 20189/20/18 – 12/24/18−19.3−5.1−4.4
COVID crash2/19/20 – 3/23/20−33.7−12.2−11.4
2022 inflation bear1/3/22 – 10/12/22−24.5−7.3−7.3
2025 tariff shock2/19/25 – 4/8/25−18.8−9.8−9.6

Total return over each SPY decline, per cent.

Calendar years

YearSPYCashBest ETFBest ETF
vs SPY
199622.622.622.60.0
199733.533.533.50.0
199828.720.622.7−6.0
199920.420.420.40.0
2000−9.7−14.0−12.6−2.9
2001−11.8−3.40.0+11.8
2002−21.6−2.70.3+21.9
200328.223.223.0−5.2
200410.710.710.70.0
20054.80.1−0.1−4.9
200615.811.211.1−4.7
20075.10.20.8−4.3
2008−36.8−4.31.4+38.2
200926.439.138.3+11.9
201015.110.010.9−4.2
YearSPYCashBest ETFBest ETF
vs SPY
20111.9−6.2−8.4−10.3
201216.016.016.00.0
201332.332.332.30.0
201413.513.513.50.0
20151.3−5.2−5.1−6.4
201612.08.411.4−0.6
201721.721.721.70.0
2018−4.65.36.2+10.8
201931.219.619.4−11.8
202018.426.728.1+9.7
202128.728.728.70.0
2022−18.2−6.7−6.7+11.5
202326.216.216.4−9.8
202424.924.924.90.0
202517.717.318.0+0.3

Total return, per cent. “Best ETF vs SPY”: difference in percentage points; green = Best ETF ahead of SPY, red = behind, grey = fully invested all year (equal to SPY). 1995 (from February 9) and 2026 (to October 30): always invested, SPY and both variants +30.2 and +11.7.

Full years 1996–2025SPYCashBest ETF
Losing years675
Years worse than −10%411
Worst year−36.8−14.0−12.6
Years better than SPY—78
Years equal to SPY (always invested)—1010

Returns rounded to 0.1%.

Disclosure. All performance figures are hypothetical results of applying the published rules to historical data. Escape-asset prices before each ETF’s launch are simulated. The figures do not represent actual trading and do not include costs, slippage or taxes. Past performance, actual or simulated, does not guarantee future results. iM-DrawdownShield is a mathematical model; it is not investment advice.

With reference to Section 202(a)(11)(D) of the Investment Advisers Act: We are Engineers and not Investment Advisers, read more ...
By the mere act of reading this page and navigating this site you acknowledge, agree to, and abide by the Terms of Use / Disclaimer