Out of sample performance summary of our models for the past 1, 2, 4 and 13 week periods. The active active return indicates how the models over- or underperformed the benchmark ETF SPY. Also the YTD, and the 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year annualized returns are shown in the second table
iM-Inflation Attuned Multi-Model Market Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 6.4%, and for the last 12 months is 7.2%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.2% and 13.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Inflation Attuned Multi-Model Market Timer gained -4.16% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 3/24/2017 would have grown to $162,968,100 which includes $4,109,301 cash and excludes $4,103,439 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-Conference Board LEIg Timer: The model’s performance YTD is 14.3%, and for the last 12 months is 7.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 20.1% and 9.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Conference Board LEIg Timer gained -0.06% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 4/5/2017 would have grown to $779,824 which includes $9,534 cash and excludes $769 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-FlipSaver 60:40 | 20:80 – 2017:The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 7.8%, and for the last 12 months is 8.3%. Over the same period the benchmark E60B40 performance was 6.8% and 8.2% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-FlipSaver 80:20 | 20:80 gained 0.02% at a time when SPY gained 0.25%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/16/2015 would have grown to $193,339 which includes $484 cash and excludes $5,614 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-FlipSaver 70:30 | 20:80 – 2017: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 9.0%, and for the last 12 months is 9.6%. Over the same period the benchmark E60B40 performance was 6.8% and 8.2% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-FlipSaver 70:30 | 20:80 gained 0.08% at a time when SPY gained 0.25%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/15/2015 would have grown to $203,723 which includes $916 cash and excludes $5,886 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-FlipSaver 80:20 | 20:80 – 2017:The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 10.3%, and for the last 12 months is 10.9%. Over the same period the benchmark E60B40 performance was 6.8% and 8.2% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-FlipSaver 80:20 | 20:80 gained 0.13% at a time when SPY gained 0.25%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2017 would have grown to $214,258 which includes $121 cash and excludes $6,150 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-5HedgeFundSelect: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 913.69% while the benchmark SPY gained 339.02% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-5HedgeFundSelect gained 2.22% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $25,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $253,422 which includes -$3,574 cash and excludes $3,639 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 649.71% while the benchmark SPY gained 339.02% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect gained -0.22% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $25,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $176,977 which includes -$10,400 cash and excludes $2,096 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-Top5(QQQ)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 1880.24% while the benchmark SPY gained 339.02% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(QQQ)Select gained -1.37% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $1,980,243 which includes -$95,730 cash and excludes $37,919 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-Top5(XLB)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 323.91% while the benchmark SPY gained 339.02% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLB)Select gained 2.85% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $423,912 which includes $4,415 cash and excludes $18,262 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-Top5(XLI)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 519.31% while the benchmark SPY gained 339.02% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLI)Select gained 0.46% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $619,308 which includes -$3,644 cash and excludes $10,452 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-Top5(XLK)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 1103.48% while the benchmark SPY gained 339.02% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLK)Select gained -1.04% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $1,203,477 which includes $3,792 cash and excludes $4,453 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-Top5(XLP)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 268.20% while the benchmark SPY gained 339.02% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLP)Select gained -2.13% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $368,199 which includes -$658 cash and excludes $3,653 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-Top5(XLV)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 417.78% while the benchmark SPY gained 339.02% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLV)Select gained -1.14% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $517,783 which includes $3,604 cash and excludes $20,953 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-Top5(XLU)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 224.40% while the benchmark SPY gained 339.02% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLU)Select gained 0.02% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $324,398 which includes -$459 cash and excludes $19,368 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-Top5(XLY)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 392.69% while the benchmark SPY gained 339.02% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLY)Select gained 6.35% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $492,689 which includes $480 cash and excludes $8,975 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-Seasonal Super-Sectors (Top5 combo) : Since inception, on 11/17/2020, the model gained 170.92% while the benchmark SPY gained 127.90% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Seasonal Super-Sectors (Top5 combo) gained 2.13% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 11/17/2020 would have grown to $270,916 which includes $12,385 cash and excludes $00 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-Dividend Growth Portfolio: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 38.1%, and for the last 12 months is 40.0%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.2% and 13.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Dividend Growth Portfolio gained 4.20% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $735,491 which includes -$1,525 cash and excludes $16,331 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-Gold Momentum Timer (AU, NEM, SBSW):The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -5.3%, and for the last 12 months is 26.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.2% and 13.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Gold Momentum Timer (AU, NEM, SBSW) gained 14.73% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to -$08 which includes $306,794 cash and excludes Gain to date spent on fees and slippage.
iM-ModSum/YieldCurve Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 7.7%, and for the last 12 months is 7.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.2% and 13.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-PortSum/YieldCurve Timer gained 0.08% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/1/2016 would have grown to $412,619 which includes $144 cash and excludes $2,605 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-Best10(VDIGX)-Trader:The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 8.7%, and for the last 12 months is 12.0%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.2% and 13.4% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 305.03% while the benchmark SPY gained 371.27% and VDIGX gained -100.00% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best10(VDIGX) gained 1.00% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $405,029 which includes $1,122 cash and excludes $5,837 spent on fees and slippage.
iM 6-Stock Capital Strength Portfolio: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 33.0%, and for the last 12 months is 37.7%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.2% and 13.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM 6-Stock Capital Strength Portfolio gained -4.98% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 10/28/2016 would have grown to $341,637 which includes $2,124 cash and excludes $4,946 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader:The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 21.2%, and for the last 12 months is 26.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.2% and 13.4% respectively. Since inception, on 6/30/2014, the model gained 417.69% while the benchmark SPY gained 371.27% and the ETF USMV gained -100.00% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader gained -0.54% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2014 would have grown to $517,688 which includes $790 cash and excludes $9,319 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-Min Volatility(USMV) Investor (Tax Efficient): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 20.8%, and for the last 12 months is 27.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.2% and 13.4% respectively. Since inception, on 1/3/2013, the model gained 1337.32% while the benchmark SPY gained 550.55% and the ETF USMV gained -100.00% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q1 gained -1.33% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/3/2013 would have grown to $1,437,323 which includes $2,143 cash and excludes $18,857 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-Bond Market Trader (High-Yield Bond or 10-yr Treasury Bond): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -0.1%, and for the last 12 months is 0.0%. Over the same period the benchmark BND performance was 0.0% and 0.3% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Bond Market Trader (High-Yield Bond or 10-yr Treasury Bond) gained 0.32% at a time when BND gained 0.41%. A starting capital of $10,000 at inception on 1/3/2000 would have grown to $148,949 which includes $2,987 cash and excludes $2,977 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-ModSum/YieldCurve Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 7.7%, and for the last 12 months is 7.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.2% and 13.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-PortSum/YieldCurve Timer gained 0.08% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/1/2016 would have grown to $412,619 which includes $144 cash and excludes $2,605 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-Best2 MC-Score ETF System: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 14.7%, and for the last 12 months is 16.9%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.2% and 13.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Best2 MC-Score ETF System gained -0.02% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $215,903 which includes $2,974 cash and excludes $5,779 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-Best4 MC-Score Vanguard System: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 8.7%, and for the last 12 months is 7.9%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.2% and 13.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Best4 MC-Score Vanguard System gained 0.95% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $198,829 which includes $9,076 cash and excludes $00 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-Composite (SPY-IEF) Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 12.6%, and for the last 12 months is 12.7%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.2% and 13.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Composite (SPY-IEF) Timer gained 0.08% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $243,770 which includes $2,156 cash and excludes $8,651 spent on fees and slippage.
iM-Composite(Gold-Stocks-Bond) Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -4.8%, and for the last 12 months is 2.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.2% and 13.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Composite(Gold-Stocks-Bond) Timer gained 2.57% at a time when SPY gained 0.08%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $384,241 which includes $758 cash and excludes $12,351 spent on fees and slippage.
October 30, 2026
Bond-market:
To view this premium content requires membership category: Bronze or higher. However, it can be freely viewed after 11-27-2026 16:00 UTC, or please login or register
The Yield Curve:
To view this premium content requires membership category: Bronze or higher. However, it can be freely viewed after 11-27-2026 16:00 UTC, or please login or register
Silver:
To view this premium content requires membership category: Bronze or higher. However, it can be freely viewed after 11-27-2026 16:00 UTC, or please login or register
To view this premium content requires membership category: Bronze or higher. However, it can be freely viewed after 11-27-2026 16:00 UTC, or please login or register
To view this premium content requires membership category: Bronze or higher. However, it can be freely viewed after 11-27-2026 16:00 UTC, or please login or register
The MAC-AU model is dis-invested from the Australian stock market sine end April 2025.
The growth of the Conference Board’s Leading Economic Indicator does not signal a recession.
The Forward Rate Ratio between the 2-year and 10-year U.S. Treasury yields (FRR2-10) is no longer inverted and the curve is steepening.
A description of this indicator can be found here.
The iM-Low Frequency Timer switched to bonds on 9/26/2022.
A description of this indicator can be found here.
October 29, 2026
iM-Business Cycle Index
The BCI is not signalling a recession
Monthly Updates
May 8, 2026
Unemployment
The 5/8/2026 BLS Employment Situation Report reports that the April 2026 unemployment rate remained unchanged at 4.3%.
Our UER model does signal a recession with a near zero recession probability of (see graph).
CAPE-Cycle-ID
Fig 9a depicts the CAPE-Cycle-ID and the year-on-year rate-of-change of the Shiller CAPE; the level switched from -2 to 0 end of June 2023 generating a buy signal. This indicator now invested in the markets. This indicator is described here.
To avoid the bear market, exit stocks when the spread between the 5-month and 25-month moving averages of S&P-real becomes negative and simultaneously the CAPE-Cycle-ID score is 0 or -2. (read more)
Estimated Forward 10-Year Returns
The estimated forward 10‐year annualized real return is 4.7% (previous month 5.0%) with a 95% confidence interval 3.3% to 6.2% (3.6% to 6.5%). Also refer to the Realized Forward 10-Year Returns vs. Inflation Rate We may be in a rising inflation period with a falling CAPE-MA35 ratio similar to 1964-1973. This implies very low or negative 10 year forward annualized real returns, much lower than the returns indicated by regression analysis shown in the Estimated Forward 10-Year Returns.
.
iM-GT Timer
The iM-GT Timer, based on Google Search Trends volume indicator is not invested in the stock markets since beginning November 2025. This indicator is described here.
Trade Weighted USD
Will be updated later, the weekly FRED data series we used was discontinued and replacement series is daily and runs from 2015. We need to adapt our software and graphics first.
TIAA Real Estate Account
The 1-year rolling return is =1.88% (previous month 2.26%) and is invested in the TIAA Real Estate Account since beginning May 2025.
A fully technical S&P 500 market timer using a novel three-horizon trend analysis to identify sustained market movements, reduce exposure during declining markets and participate in rising markets — with relatively infrequent trading.
Investing in the stock market can deliver attractive long-term returns, but major market crashes can wipe out years of gains.
The challenge is not simply to make money in rising markets, but to protect your capital when markets turn down.
The iM-DrawdownShieldis designed to do both. It follows the S&P 500 during favourable market conditions and switches to defensive investments when the risk of a sustained decline increases. Its objective is to reduce major losses without sacrificing long-term investment performance.
In a historical simulation covering 1995–2026, the S&P 500 ETF (SPY) experienced a maximum drawdown of 55.2%. The model’s dynamically selected Treasury ETF strategy reduced this to 19.6%, while achieving an annualised return of 12.1%, compared with 11.0% for SPY.
The S&P 500 averaged 6,736 for October 2025, 2,604 points above its long-term trend of 4,132, implying a 39% decline to reach the trend and signifying a valuation substantially above historic norm.
The long-term trend indicates a forward 10-year annualized real return of only 1.4%, while the CAPE-MA35 methodology derived 10-year annualized real return is also modest at about 4.3%, indicating limited long-term upside.
The short-term outlook indicated by CAPE-MA35 Neutral phase has historically yielded low short-term returns.
This is a dynamic ETF allocation strategy using the CAPE-MA35 ratio—the Shiller CAPE divided by its 35-year moving average—to identify market phases and adjust portfolio exposure.
The model defines four primary phases with respective ETFs—Growth (QQQ), Defensive (GLD, XLU), Uptrend (QQQ, XLE), and Downtrend (GLD)—based on the trend and relative valuation of CAPE-MA35. ETF allocations are adjusted monthly in response to these phases.
Backtesting from 1999 to 2025 shows the model outperforms SPY with 20.1% annualized returns, lower drawdowns, and consistent long-term performance with low turnover.
The strategy offers a practical, rules-based approach to market timing, blending long-term valuation with trend analysis for superior risk-adjusted returns.
This study presents a rules-based ETF allocation model that uses the CAPE-MA35 ratio—the Shiller CAPE divided by its 35-year moving average—to identify distinct market phases and dynamically adjust portfolio exposure.
The model defines four primary phases—Growth, Defensive, Uptrend, and Downtrend—based on the trend and relative valuation of CAPE-MA35. ETF allocations are adjusted monthly in response to these phases.
The average of S&P 500 for March 2025 was 5,680, declining to 5,074 by April 4, 2025 (now 13% up from Jul-2023 average of 4,497 when forward returns for stocks “looked reasonably good” according to this analysis).
The S&P 500 is still 1,140 points higher than the corresponding long-term trend value of 3,934 for April 2025.
For the S&P 500 to reach the corresponding long-trend value would entail a 22% decline from the April 4, 2025 value, indicating that the S&P 500 is still considerably overvalued.
Assuming that the current S&P 500 value remains unchanged until the end of April, then the CAPE-ratio would be 31.0, 15% higher than its 35-year moving average (MA35), currently at 26.9.
The long-term trend indicates a forward 10-year annualized real return of 4.0%, while the CAPE-MA35 methodology derived 10-year annualized real return is better at about 6.7%.
With reference to Section 202(a)(11)(D) of the Investment Advisers Act:
We are Engineers and not Investment Advisers,
read more ... By the mere act of reading this page and navigating this site you acknowledge, agree to, and abide by the Terms of Use / Disclaimer