Blog Archives

iM-Best Reports – 5/1/2017

Read more >

Posted in pmp SPY-SH

iM-Best Reports – 4/24/2017

Read more >

Posted in pmp SPY-SH

iM-Best Reports – 4/17/2017

Read more >

Posted in pmp SPY-SH

iM-Best Reports – 4/10/2017

Read more >

Posted in pmp SPY-SH

iM-Best Reports – 4/3/2017

Read more >

Posted in pmp SPY-SH

iM-Best Reports – 3/27/2017

Performance-wk-3-28-2017 Performance-mth-3-28-2017 Out of sample performance summary of our models for the past 1, 2, 4 and 13 week periods. The active active return indicates how the models over- or underperformed the benchmark ETF SPY. Also the YTD, and the 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year annualized returns are shown in the second table
Fig-1.SPY-SH-3-28-2017
iM-Best(SPY-SH).R1: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 5.1%, and for the last 12 months is 12.9%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.0% and 17.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of Best(SPY-SH) gained -1.33% at a time when SPY gained -1.33%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2009 would have grown to $485,973 which includes $44 cash and excludes $15,358 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-2.Combo3-3-28-2017
iM-Combo3.R1: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 4.1%, and for the last 12 months is 7.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.0% and 17.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Combo3.R1 gained -1.59% at a time when SPY gained -1.33%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/3/2014 would have grown to $130,765 which includes -$2,155 cash and excludes $3,244 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-15.Combo5-3-28-2017
iM-Combo5: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 4.8%, and for the last 12 months is 5.0%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.0% and 17.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Combo5 gained -1.53% at a time when SPY gained -1.33%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/22/2016 would have grown to $103,376 which includes -$1,413 cash and excludes $505 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-14.Best8TaxEff-3-28-2017
The iM-Best8(S&P500 Min Vol)Tax-Efficient The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 2.9%, and for the last 12 months is -15.0%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.0% and 17.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best8(S&P 500)Tax-Eff. gained -0.82% at a time when SPY gained -1.33%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2009 would have grown to $404,667 which includes $29,357 cash and excludes $8,323 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-8.VDIGXtrade-3-28-2017Fig-8.1.VDIGXtrade-3-28-2017
iM-Best10(VDIGX)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 4.3%, and for the last 12 months is 21.2%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.0% and 17.4% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 52.01% while the benchmark SPY gained 26.20% and VDIGX gained 24.36% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best10(VDIGX) gained -1.34% at a time when SPY gained -1.33%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $152,006 which includes $11,986 cash and excludes $1,501 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-19.Best2MCsETF-3-28-2017
iM-Best2 MC-Score ETF System: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 5.7%, and since inception 2.5%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.0% and 13.2% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-BESTOGA-3 gained -0.68% at a time when SPY gained -1.33%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $354 which includes $106 cash and excludes Gain to date spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-4.Bestoga3-3-28-2017
iM-BESTOGA-3: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 7.5%, and for the last 12 months is 12.7%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.0% and 17.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-BESTOGA-3 gained -2.13% at a time when SPY gained -1.33%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/3/2014 would have grown to $217,499 which includes $21,730 cash and excludes $767 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-18.HiD-LoV-3-28-2017
iM-Best7(HiD-LoV): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 3.3%, and since inception 6.1%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.0% and 13.2% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best7(HiD-LoV) gained 0.10% at a time when SPY gained -1.33%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $106,126 which includes -$77 cash and excludes $747 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-16.ShortRSL3000-3-28-2017
iM-Best10(Short Russell3000): The model’s performance YTD is -7.7%, and for the last 12 months is -41.0%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.0% and 17.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best10(Short Russell3000) gained 2.47% at a time when SPY gained -1.33%. Over the period 2/3/2014 to 3/27/2017 the starting capital of $100,000 would have grown to $7,893 which includes $10,885 cash and excludes $1,730 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-17.BestogaX5-3-28-2017
iM-BestogaX5-System: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 5.2%, and since inception 3.7%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.0% and 17.3% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best8(S&P 500)Tax-Eff. gained -0.85% at a time when SPY gained -1.33%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 3/28/2016 would have grown to $103,652 which includes $637 cash and excludes $488 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-7.USMVtrade-3-28-2017Fig-7.1.USMVtrade-3-28-2017
iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 6.4%, and for the last 12 months is 12.5%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.0% and 17.4% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 48.83% while the benchmark SPY gained 26.20% and the ETF USMV gained 34.83% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader gained -1.89% at a time when SPY gained -1.33%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $148,834 which includes $15 cash and excludes $2,937 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-9.USMVQ1-3-28-2017 Fig-9.1.USMVQ1-3-28-2017
iM-Best12(USMV)Q1-Investor: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 6.8%, and for the last 12 months is 22.9%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.0% and 17.4% respectively. Since inception, on 1/5/2015, the model gained 34.41% while the benchmark SPY gained 21.28% and the ETF USMV gained 23.82% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q1 gained -1.66% at a time when SPY gained -1.33%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2015 would have grown to $134,406 which includes $96 cash and excludes $707 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-10.USMVQ2-3-28-2017 Fig-10.1.USMVQ2-3-28-2017
iM-Best12(USMV)Q2-Investor: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 5.3%, and for the last 12 months is 16.0%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.0% and 17.4% respectively. Since inception, on 3/31/2015, the model gained 21.14% while the benchmark SPY gained 16.94% and the ETF USMV gained 19.59% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q2 gained -1.12% at a time when SPY gained -1.33%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 3/31/2015 would have grown to $121,136 which includes $144 cash and excludes $573 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-5.USMVQ3-3-28-2017 Fig-5.1.USMVQ3-3-28-2017
iM-Best12(USMV)Q3-Investor: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 4.6%, and for the last 12 months is 30.7%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.0% and 17.4% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 62.20% while the benchmark SPY gained 26.20% and the ETF USMV gained 34.83% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q3 gained -1.37% at a time when SPY gained -1.33%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $162,196 which includes $133 cash and excludes $972 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-6.USMVQ4-3-28-2017Fig-6.1.USMVQ4-3-28-2017
iM-Best12(USMV)Q4-Investor: Since inception, on 9/30/2014, the model gained 47.46% while the benchmark SPY gained 24.51% and the ETF USMV gained 32.97% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q4 gained -1.32% at a time when SPY gained -1.33%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 9/30/2014 would have grown to $147,465 which includes $143 cash and excludes $827 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-10.USMV-Portfolio-vs-SPY-3-28-2017
Average Performance of iM-Best12(USMV)Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4-Investor resulted in an excess return of 32.92% over SPY. (see iM-USMV Investor Portfolio)
Fig-3.Short-3-28-2017
iM-Best(Short): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 0.0%, and for the last 12 months is -6.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.0% and 17.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best(Short) gained 0.11% at a time when SPY gained -1.33%. Over the period 1/2/2009 to 3/27/2017 the starting capital of $100,000 would have grown to $96,785 which includes $96,785 cash and excludes $21,630 spent on fees and slippage.

 
Read more >

Posted in pmp SPY-SH

iM-Best Reports – 3/20/2017

Read more >

Posted in pmp SPY-SH

iM-Best Reports – 3/13/2017

Read more >

Posted in pmp SPY-SH

iM-Best Reports – 3/6/2017

Read more >

Posted in pmp SPY-SH

iM-Best Reports – 2/27/2017

Read more >

Posted in pmp SPY-SH
With reference to Section 202(a)(11)(D) of the Investment Advisers Act: We are Engineers and not Investment Advisers, read more ...
By the mere act of reading this page and navigating this site you acknowledge, agree to, and abide by the Terms of Use / Disclaimer