Minimum Volatility Stocks: Out-Of-Sample Performance of iM-Best12(USMV)

The backtest reported in this article showed that ranking the holdings of USMV, the iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ETF, and selecting a portfolio of the 12 top ranked stocks, provided higher returns for the portfolio than for the underlying ETF. To test these findings out-of-sample we launched the Best12(USMV)-July-2014model on Jun-30-2014 and published the holdings on our website then. So far this portfolio has gained 8.2%, while USMV is up a mere 2.2%. This test will be expanded by the launch of the second of three sister models quarterly displaced, the Best12(USMV)-Oct-2014, which again will consist of the 12 highest ranked stocks of the then point-in-time holdings of USMV.

Eventually there will be four quarterly displaced Best12(USMV) models at iMarketSignals to check whether the out-of-sample (OOS) performances of the models exceeds those of USMV over the same periods. Only when the OOS periods are long enough can one decide whether this is a profitable investment strategy. One can probably assume this to be the case if by October next year the combined returns of the models is indeed significantly higher than the combined returns of USMV for the corresponding periods. Although the model’s performance since June was considerably better than that of USMV, one should not commit capital in the expectation that strategies that worked well in-sample, and for a few months OOS, are therefore also bound to do well in the future.

Backtest Parameters

It is relatively simple to “overfit” an investment strategy so that it performs well in-sample, but the more complex a model is, the higher the likelihood of the OOS performance to underperform the backtest’s results. Therefore a simple algorithm with only a few parameters was chosen, with buy- and sell rules kept to a minimum, details of which were provided in the original article. The model should also be tax-efficient because the holding period for each stock will normally be at least one year long.

Current Holdings and Return to Sep-22-2014 for Best12(USMV)-July-2014

Of the portfolio’s initial holdings of 12 stocks, 11 of them gained value since inception on Jun-30-14, with the portfolio showing a 8.21% return to Sep-22, while iShares’ USMV gained only 2.20% over the same period. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception grew to $108,209, with fees and slippage accounted for.

The table below shows the current holdings, unchanged since inception, and return for each position.


The performance graphs of $100 invested in the Best12(USMV) and SPY (the ETF tracking the S&P500), is shown below, with the red graph indicating the value of Best12(USMV) and the blue graph depicting the value of SPY. It is noteworthy that in the period July 16 to August 7 SPY lost 3.5%, whereas in the same time the portfolio lost only 0.85%; this better performance was expected from a portfolio selected from low volatility stocks and is depicted with the blue/red arrow.

usmv-2-fig1(click to enlarge)

The subsequent very high gain, shown by the green arrow, may be an indication that the model is well on track to outperform SPY as predicted by the backtest. Even when excluding the two most profitable positions, LUV and ROST, the model would still have gained 5.90%, giving an excess return of 3.72% over SPY.

Following the Models

At our website, the weekly performance update could be followed already from July 2014 onward. It was originally predicted that a 12-stock model should outperform USMV, which the results of the July model so far confirm. (The weekly updates can also be viewed by non-subscribers to iM in the archive section, delayed by a few weeks.)

To track performance over an extended OOS period we will be adding, additional to the Jul-2014 and Oct-2014 models, another two similar models, the Jan-2015 and Apr-2015 models. At inception each model will have a 12-stock portfolio selected from the point-in-time holdings of USMV.

The universe from which stocks are selected will be updated every three months for each model with the universe corresponding to the then current holdings of USMV. Current holdings of the models, which may not be included in the new universe, will be added to the universe. This will ensure that stocks are not sold because they may be omitted from future holdings of USMV, and the models can keep their holdings for at least one year as stipulated by the sell rules.

It is expected that by April 2015 the combined stock holdings of the four models will be about 20% of the holdings of USMV, about 30 different stocks. The portfolio is expected to show better returns than USMV, provided that the OOS performance continuous to confirm the backtest’s results.

Tagged with: ,
Posted in blogs, featured, USMV
4 comments on “Minimum Volatility Stocks: Out-Of-Sample Performance of iM-Best12(USMV)
  1. bobbykauf says:

    “Therefore a simple algorithm with only a few parameters was chosen, with buy- and sell rules kept to a minimum, details of which were provided in the original article.”

    How do I access the original article?

  2. bobbykauf says:

    Given the sell rules you state in

    It appears you limit sector weights to under 30% and industry weights to under 20%.

    Is that correct. Also, do you hold all positions for one year or do you sell when price declines more than 15% from the most recent high since the position was opened?

    • geovrba says:

      Rules are in the article and your interpretation is correct. Positions are held at least 1 year unless a stock declines by more than 15% from recent high since the position was opened.

Leave a Reply

With reference to Section 202(a)(11)(D) of the Investment Advisers Act: We are Engineers and not Investment Advisers, read more ...
By the mere act of reading this page and navigating this site you acknowledge, agree to, and abide by the Terms of Use / Disclaimer