Home › pmp › pmp SPY-SH › iM-Best Reports – 10/10/2022

iM-Best Reports – 10/10/2022

Performance-wk-10-11-2022 Performance-mth-10-11-2022 Out of sample performance summary of our models for the past 1, 2, 4 and 13 week periods. The active active return indicates how the models over- or underperformed the benchmark ETF SPY. Also the YTD, and the 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year annualized returns are shown in the second table
30-im-fs-6040-10-11-2022
 iM-FlipSaver 60:40 | 20:80 – 2017: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -16.8%, and for the last 12 months is -12.4%. Over the same period the benchmark E60B40 performance was -19.8% and -15.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-FlipSaver 80:20 | 20:80 gained -1.37% at a time when SPY gained -1.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/16/2015 would have grown to $135,554 which includes $738 cash and excludes $2,673 spent on fees and slippage.
31-im-fs-7030-10-11-2022
 iM-FlipSaver 70:30 | 20:80 – 2017: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -17.1%, and for the last 12 months is -12.4%. Over the same period the benchmark E60B40 performance was -19.8% and -15.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-FlipSaver 70:30 | 20:80 gained -1.37% at a time when SPY gained -1.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/15/2015 would have grown to $139,401 which includes $850 cash and excludes $2,831 spent on fees and slippage.
32-im-fs-8020-10-11-2022
 iM-FlipSaver 80:20 | 20:80 – 2017: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -17.4%, and for the last 12 months is -12.4%. Over the same period the benchmark E60B40 performance was -19.8% and -15.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-FlipSaver 80:20 | 20:80 gained -1.37% at a time when SPY gained -1.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2017 would have grown to $143,096 which includes $1,001 cash and excludes $2,982 spent on fees and slippage.
18-5HedgeFundSelect-10-11-2022 18-1.5HedgeFundSelect-10-11-2022
 iM-5HedgeFundSelect: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 269.55% while the benchmark SPY gained 99.37% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-5HedgeFundSelect gained -3.44% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $25,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $92,389 which includes $698 cash and excludes $1,780 spent on fees and slippage.
10-iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect-10-11-2022 10-1.iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect-10-11-2022
 iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 161.95% while the benchmark SPY gained 99.37% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect gained -2.92% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $25,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $65,487 which includes $64 cash and excludes $1,152 spent on fees and slippage.
38-iM-Top5QQQSelect-10-11-202238-1.iM-Top5QQQSelect-10-11-2022
 iM-Top5(QQQ)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 375.18% while the benchmark SPY gained 99.37% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(QQQ)Select gained -5.37% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $475,182 which includes $2,160 cash and excludes $9,392 spent on fees and slippage.
37-iM-Top5XLBSelect-10-11-202237-1.iM-Top5XLBSelect-10-11-2022
 iM-Top5(XLB)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 134.01% while the benchmark SPY gained 99.37% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLB)Select gained 1.36% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $234,005 which includes -$2,157 cash and excludes $8,658 spent on fees and slippage.
35-iM-Top5XLISelect-10-11-202235-1.iM-Top5XLISelect-10-11-2022
 iM-Top5(XLI)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 230.51% while the benchmark SPY gained 99.37% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLI)Select gained -0.01% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $330,509 which includes $5,834 cash and excludes $5,251 spent on fees and slippage.
27-iM-Top5XLKSelect-10-11-202227-1.iM-Top5XLKSelect-10-11-2022
 iM-Top5(XLK)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 351.19% while the benchmark SPY gained 99.37% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLK)Select gained -1.93% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $451,186 which includes $4,715 cash and excludes $1,738 spent on fees and slippage.
28-iM-Top5XLPSelect-10-11-202228-1.iM-Top5XLPSelect-10-11-2022
 iM-Top5(XLP)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 148.16% while the benchmark SPY gained 99.37% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLP)Select gained 0.85% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $248,156 which includes $1,446 cash and excludes $1,702 spent on fees and slippage.
33-iM-Top5XLVSelect-10-11-202233-1.iM-Top5XLVSelect-10-11-2022
 iM-Top5(XLV)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 327.09% while the benchmark SPY gained 99.37% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLV)Select gained -1.03% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $427,092 which includes $47 cash and excludes $8,449 spent on fees and slippage.
34-iM-Top5XLUSelect-10-11-202234-1.iM-Top5XLUSelect-10-11-2022
 iM-Top5(XLU)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 112.68% while the benchmark SPY gained 99.37% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLU)Select gained -1.81% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $212,684 which includes -$145 cash and excludes $10,303 spent on fees and slippage.
36-iM-Top5XLYSelect-10-11-202236-1.iM-Top5XLYSelect-10-11-2022
 iM-Top5(XLY)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 150.19% while the benchmark SPY gained 99.37% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLY)Select gained 0.20% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $250,190 which includes $5,835 cash and excludes $5,129 spent on fees and slippage.
39-Top5SeasonalCombo-10-11-2022
 iM-Seasonal Super-Sectors (Top5 combo) : Since inception, on 11/17/2020, the model gained 7.71% while the benchmark SPY gained 3.50% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Seasonal Super-Sectors (Top5 combo) gained -2.01% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 11/17/2020 would have grown to $107,712 which includes $2,678 cash and excludes $00 spent on fees and slippage.
17-DividendGrowth-10-11-2022
 iM-Dividend Growth Portfolio: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -20.8%, and for the last 12 months is -20.1%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -23.3% and -16.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Dividend Growth Portfolio gained -1.97% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $318,990 which includes $2,056 cash and excludes $8,653 spent on fees and slippage.
16-GoldMomentum-10-11-2022
 iM-Gold Momentum Timer (AU, NEM, SBSW): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -46.2%, and for the last 12 months is -36.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -23.3% and -16.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Gold Momentum Timer (AU, NEM, SBSW) gained -5.83% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $07 which includes $120,794 cash and excludes Gain to date spent on fees and slippage.
4-ModSumYieldCurve-10-11-2022
 iM-ModSum/YieldCurve Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -21.9%, and for the last 12 months is -21.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -23.3% and -16.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-PortSum/YieldCurve Timer gained -1.79% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/1/2016 would have grown to $229,818 which includes $485 cash and excludes $1,114 spent on fees and slippage.
1-SPY-SH-10-11-2022
 iM-Best(SPY-SH).R1: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -31.1%, and for the last 12 months is -25.1%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -23.3% and -16.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of Best(SPY-SH) gained -1.79% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2009 would have grown to $61,115 which includes $272 cash and excludes $2,306 spent on fees and slippage.
2-Combo3-10-11-2022
 iM-Combo3.R1: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -13.5%, and for the last 12 months is -3.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -23.3% and -16.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Combo3.R1 gained -0.80% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/3/2014 would have grown to $182,195 which includes $1,394 cash and excludes $7,985 spent on fees and slippage.
15-Combo5-10-11-2022
 iM-Combo5: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -34.4%, and for the last 12 months is -27.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -23.3% and -16.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Combo5 gained -1.28% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/22/2016 would have grown to $149,085 which includes $571 cash and excludes $0 spent on fees and slippage.
8-VDIGXtrade-10-11-20228-1.VDIGXtrade-10-11-2022
 iM-Best10(VDIGX)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -20.9%, and for the last 12 months is -13.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -23.3% and -16.5% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 153.34% while the benchmark SPY gained 114.02% and VDIGX gained 115.40% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best10(VDIGX) gained -1.80% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $253,342 which includes $486 cash and excludes $4,365 spent on fees and slippage.
29-im6-cap-strg-10-11-2022
 iM 6-Stock Capital Strength Portfolio: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -13.5%, and for the last 12 months is -7.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -23.3% and -16.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM 6-Stock Capital Strength Portfolio gained -0.10% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 10/28/2016 would have grown to $187,988 which includes $4,602 cash and excludes $2,452 spent on fees and slippage.
7-USMVtrade-10-11-20227-1.USMVtrade-10-11-2022
 iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -12.3%, and for the last 12 months is -8.9%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -23.3% and -16.5% respectively. Since inception, on 6/30/2014, the model gained 130.14% while the benchmark SPY gained 114.02% and the ETF USMV gained 108.29% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader gained -0.69% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2014 would have grown to $230,141 which includes $1,008 cash and excludes $7,596 spent on fees and slippage.
13-MinVolUSMVInv-10-11-2022 13-1.MinVolUSMVInv-10-11-2022
 iM-Min Volatility(USMV) Investor (Tax Efficient): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 8.7%, and for the last 12 months is 15.9%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -23.3% and -16.5% respectively. Since inception, on 1/3/2013, the model gained 524.60% while the benchmark SPY gained 195.44% and the ETF USMV gained 195.44% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q1 gained -0.86% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/3/2013 would have grown to $624,595 which includes $1,422 cash and excludes $6,847 spent on fees and slippage.
5-bnd-mkt-trdr-10-11-2022
 iM-Bond Market Trader (High-Yield Bond or 10-yr Treasury Bond): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -15.1%, and for the last 12 months is -14.5%. Over the same period the benchmark BND performance was -15.2% and -14.8% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Bond Market Trader (High-Yield Bond or 10-yr Treasury Bond) gained -1.58% at a time when BND gained -1.62%. A starting capital of $10,000 at inception on 1/3/2000 would have grown to $128,957 which includes $647 cash and excludes $2,439 spent on fees and slippage.
4-ModSumYieldCurve-10-11-2022
 iM-ModSum/YieldCurve Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -21.9%, and for the last 12 months is -21.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -23.3% and -16.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-PortSum/YieldCurve Timer gained -1.79% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/1/2016 would have grown to $229,818 which includes $485 cash and excludes $1,114 spent on fees and slippage.
25-Best2MCsETF-10-11-2022
 iM-Best2 MC-Score ETF System: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -16.6%, and for the last 12 months is -8.5%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -23.3% and -16.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Best2 MC-Score ETF System gained -1.72% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $129,842 which includes $26 cash and excludes $1,816 spent on fees and slippage.
26-Best4MCsVang-10-11-2022
 iM-Best4 MC-Score Vanguard System: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -14.2%, and for the last 12 months is -5.7%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -23.3% and -16.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Best4 MC-Score Vanguard System gained -1.53% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $144,553 which includes $817 cash and excludes $00 spent on fees and slippage.
20-imc-spy-ief-10-11-2022
 iM-Composite (SPY-IEF) Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -17.0%, and for the last 12 months is -9.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -23.3% and -16.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Composite (SPY-IEF) Timer gained -2.35% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $167,030 which includes $239 cash and excludes $5,043 spent on fees and slippage.
22-imc-gld-stk-bnd-10-11-2022
 iM-Composite(Gold-Stocks-Bond) Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -11.7%, and for the last 12 months is -1.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -23.3% and -16.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Composite(Gold-Stocks-Bond) Timer gained -1.90% at a time when SPY gained -1.80%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $157,758 which includes $34 cash and excludes $8,879 spent on fees and slippage.
Posted in pmp SPY-SH

Leave a Reply

With reference to Section 202(a)(11)(D) of the Investment Advisers Act: We are Engineers and not Investment Advisers, read more ...
By the mere act of reading this page and navigating this site you acknowledge, agree to, and abide by the Terms of Use / Disclaimer