iM-Best Reports – 1/29/2018

Performance-wk-1-30-2018 Performance-mth-1-30-2018 Out of sample performance summary of our models for the past 1, 2, 4 and 13 week periods. The active active return indicates how the models over- or underperformed the benchmark ETF SPY. Also the YTD, and the 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year annualized returns are shown in the second table
fig1-SPY-SH-1-30-2018
iM-Best(SPY-SH).R1: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 6.6%, and for the last 12 months is 27.2%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 26.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of Best(SPY-SH) gained 0.69% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2009 would have grown to $599,356 which includes $7,222 cash and excludes $15,358 spent on fees and slippage.
fig-2-Combo3-1-30-2018
iM-Combo3.R1: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 9.0%, and for the last 12 months is 33.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 26.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Combo3.R1 gained 0.73% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/3/2014 would have grown to $171,946 which includes $2,296 cash and excludes $3,443 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-15.Combo5-1-30-2018
iM-Combo5: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 10.6%, and for the last 12 months is 41.1%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 26.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Combo5 gained 1.06% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/22/2016 would have grown to $141,292 which includes -$1,645 cash and excludes $606 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-8.VDIGXtrade-1-30-2018Fig-8.1.VDIGXtrade-1-30-2018
iM-Best10(VDIGX)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 7.8%, and for the last 12 months is 29.0%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 26.7% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 92.19% while the benchmark SPY gained 56.09% and VDIGX gained 49.08% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best10(VDIGX) gained 0.92% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $191,954 which includes $1,512 cash and excludes $1,956 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-4.Bestoga3-1-30-2018
iM-BESTOGA-3: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 2.6%, and for the last 12 months is 14.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 26.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-BESTOGA-3 gained -0.70% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/3/2014 would have grown to $237,898 which includes $2,123 cash and excludes $2,007 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-18.HiD-LoV-1-30-2018
iM-Best7(HiD-LoV): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 4.9%, and for the last 12 months is 16.2%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 26.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-BESTOGA-3 gained -0.51% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $118,891 which includes $155 cash and excludes $1,500 spent on fees and slippage.
fig29im6-cap-strg-1-30-2018
iM 6-Stock Capital Strength Portfolio: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 4.0%, and for the last 12 months is 43.6%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 26.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM 6-Stock Capital Strength Portfolio gained 0.55% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 10/28/2016 would have grown to $157,641 which includes $418 cash and excludes $630 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-17.BestogaX5-1-30-2018
iM-BestogaX5-System: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 8.9%, and for the last 12 months is 21.6%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 26.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-BestogaX5-System gained 4.93% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 3/28/2016 would have grown to $121,987 which includes $5,886 cash and excludes $933 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-7.USMVtrade-1-30-2018Fig-7.1.USMVtrade-1-30-2018
iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 6.0%, and for the last 12 months is 25.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 26.7% respectively. Since inception, on 6/30/2014, the model gained 81.38% while the benchmark SPY gained 56.09% and the ETF USMV gained 58.33% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader gained 0.77% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2014 would have grown to $181,164 which includes $728 cash and excludes $3,822 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-9.USMVQ1-1-30-2018 Fig-9.1.USMVQ1-1-30-2018
iM-Best12(USMV)Q1-Investor: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 8.4%, and for the last 12 months is 33.7%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 26.7% respectively. Since inception, on 1/5/2015, the model gained 74.92% while the benchmark SPY gained 49.99% and the ETF USMV gained 45.40% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q1 gained 2.22% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2015 would have grown to $174,858 which includes $377 cash and excludes $926 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-10.USMVQ2-1-30-2018 Fig-10.1.USMVQ2-1-30-2018
iM-Best12(USMV)Q2-Investor: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 6.0%, and for the last 12 months is 21.9%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 26.7% respectively. Since inception, on 3/30/2015, the model gained 43.78% while the benchmark SPY gained 44.65% and the ETF USMV gained 40.44% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q2 gained 0.53% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 3/30/2015 would have grown to $143,737 which includes $983 cash and excludes $874 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-5.USMVQ3-1-30-2018 Fig-5.1.USMVQ3-1-30-2018
iM-Best12(USMV)Q3-Investor: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 5.1%, and for the last 12 months is 18.0%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 26.7% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 86.67% while the benchmark SPY gained 56.09% and the ETF USMV gained 58.33% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q3 gained 0.94% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $186,613 which includes $660 cash and excludes $1,294 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-6.USMVQ4-1-30-2018Fig-6.1.USMVQ4-1-30-2018
iM-Best12(USMV)Q4-Investor: Since inception, on 9/29/2014, the model gained 81.58% while the benchmark SPY gained 53.73% and the ETF USMV gained 56.14% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q4 gained 0.09% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 9/29/2014 would have grown to $181,471 which includes $247 cash and excludes $1,197 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-10.USMV-Portfolio-vs-SPY-1-30-2018
Average Performance of iM-Best12(USMV)Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4-Investor resulted in an excess return of 39.60% over SPY. (see iM-USMV Investor Portfolio)
fig-3-Short-1-30-2018
iM-Best(Short): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -1.2%, and for the last 12 months is -6.6%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 26.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best(Short) gained 0.00% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. Over the period 1/2/2009 to 1/29/2018 the starting capital of $100,000 would have grown to $90,125 which includes $90,125 cash and excludes $23,591 spent on fees and slippage.
fig25-Best2MCsETF-1-30-2018
iM-Best2 MC-Score ETF System: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 3.4%, and for the last 12 months is 18.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 26.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Best2 MC-Score ETF System gained 0.39% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $116,151 which includes $743 cash and excludes $115 spent on fees and slippage.
fig26-Best4MCsVang-1-30-2018
iM-Best4 MC-Score Vanguard System: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -0.3%, and for the last 12 months is 10.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 26.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Best4 MC-Score Vanguard System gained -0.09% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $110,476 which includes $3,320 cash and excludes $00 spent on fees and slippage.
fig21-imc-sh-rsp-1-30-2018
iM-Composite (SH-RSP) Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 5.5%, and for the last 12 months is 21.9%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 26.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Composite (SH-RSP) Timer gained 0.44% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $137,097 which includes $2,172 cash and excludes $513 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-20-imc-spy-ief-1-30-2018
iM-Composite (SPY-IEF) Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 6.6%, and for the last 12 months is 28.9%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 26.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Composite (SPY-IEF) Timer gained 0.70% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $141,465 which includes $833 cash and excludes $1,390 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-12-vix-zif-1-30-2018
iM-VIX Timer with ZIV: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 13.8%, and for the last 12 months is 81.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 26.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-VIX Timer with ZIV gained 1.65% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $200,298 which includes $886 cash and excludes $578 spent on fees and slippage.
fig22-imc-gld-stk-bnd-1-30-2018
iM-Composite(Gold-Stocks-Bond) Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 3.0%, and for the last 12 months is 23.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 26.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Composite(Gold-Stocks-Bond) Timer gained 0.55% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $132,542 which includes $53 cash and excludes $1,955 spent on fees and slippage.
fig23iM-lo-turn-over-1-30-2018
iM-Low Turnover Composite Timer Combo: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 2.3%, and since inception 9.6%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 23.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Low Turnover Composite Timer Combo gained 0.20% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 3/24/27 would have grown to $109,591 which includes $1,612 cash and excludes $74 spent on fees and slippage.
fig28-im-min-dd-1-30-2018
iM-Min Drawdown Combo: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 3.9%, and since inception 12.1%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 23.1% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Min Drawdown Combo gained 0.12% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 4/5/2017 would have grown to $111,966 which includes $424 cash and excludes $173 spent on fees and slippage.
fig27-im-5etf-trader-1-30-2018
iM-5ETF Trader (includes leveraged ETFs): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 12.1%, and for the last 12 months is 55.1%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 26.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-5ETF Trader (includes leveraged ETFs) gained 0.96% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 10/30/2016 would have grown to $182,426 which includes $1,064 cash and excludes $1,030 spent on fees and slippage.
fig24-im-std-5etf-trader-1-30-2018
iM-Standard 5ETF Trader (excludes leveraged ETFs): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 6.0%, and for the last 12 months is 25.7%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 6.7% and 26.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Standard 5ETF Trader (excludes leveraged ETFs) gained 0.57% at a time when SPY gained 0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 10/30/2016 would have grown to $133,025 which includes $1,878 cash and excludes $880 spent on fees and slippage.

 

Posted in pmp SPY-SH

Leave a Reply

With reference to Section 202(a)(11)(D) of the Investment Advisers Act: We are Engineers and not Investment Advisers, read more ...
By the mere act of reading this page and navigating this site you acknowledge, agree to, and abide by the Terms of Use / Disclaimer