Home › pmp › pmp SPY-SH › iM-Best Reports – 10/10/2016

iM-Best Reports – 10/10/2016

Performance-wk-10-11-2016 Performance-mth-10-11-2016 Out of sample performance summary of our models for the past 1, 2, 4 and 13 week periods. The active active return indicates how the models over- or underperformed the benchmark ETF SPY. Also the YTD, and the 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year annualized returns are shown in the second table
Fig-1.SPY-SH-10-11-2016
 iM-Best(SPY-SH).R1: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 2.3%, and for the last 12 months is 8.0%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 7.7% and 9.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of Best(SPY-SH) gained 0.18% at a time when SPY gained 0.18%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2009 would have grown to $444,642 which includes -$4,971 cash and excludes $15,358 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-2.Combo3-10-11-2016
 iM-Combo3.R1: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -8.0%, and for the last 12 months is -7.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 7.7% and 9.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Combo3.R1 gained -0.32% at a time when SPY gained 0.18%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/3/2014 would have grown to $121,730 which includes $149 cash and excludes $2,866 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-15.Combo5-10-11-2016
 iM-Combo5: The model’s out of sample performance from inception is -1.5%. The benchmark SPY performance over the same period is 14.3%. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Combo5 gained -0.37% at a time when SPY gained 0.18%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/22/2016 would have grown to $98,480 which includes $19,086 cash and excludes $237 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-14.Best8TaxEff-10-11-2016
 The iM-Best8(S&P500 Min Vol)Tax-Efficient The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -4.8%, and for the last 12 months is -5.0%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 7.7% and 9.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best8(S&P 500)Tax-Eff. gained 0.11% at a time when SPY gained 0.18%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2009 would have grown to $424,006 which includes $191,243 cash and excludes $7,554 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-8.VDIGXtrade-10-11-2016Fig-8.1.VDIGXtrade-10-11-2016
 iM-Best10(VDIGX)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 1.3%, and for the last 12 months is 6.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 7.7% and 9.7% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 27.76% while the benchmark SPY gained 15.58% and the ETF VDIGX gained 15.65% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best10(VDIGX) gained -1.49% at a time when SPY gained 0.18%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $127,763 which includes $164 cash and excludes $1,302 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-19.Best2MCsETF-10-11-2016
 iM-Best2 MC-Score ETF System: The model’s out of sample performance from inception is -3.7%. The benchmark SPY performance over the same period is 3.7%. Over the previous week the market value of iM-BESTOGA-3 gained -0.89% at a time when SPY gained 0.18%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/3/2014 would have grown to $43 which includes $103 cash and excludes Gain to date spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-4.Bestoga3-10-11-2016
 iM-BESTOGA-3: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 12.8%, and for the last 12 months is 21.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 7.7% and 9.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-BESTOGA-3 gained -0.32% at a time when SPY gained 0.18%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/3/2014 would have grown to $207,314 which includes $19,002 cash and excludes $767 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-18.HiD-LoV-10-11-2016
 iM-Best7(HiD-LoV): The model’s out of sample performance from inception is -4.8%. The benchmark SPY performance over the same period is 3.7%. Over the previous week the market value of iM-BESTOGA-3 gained -0.65% at a time when SPY gained 0.18%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/3/2014 would have grown to $95,249 which includes $155 cash and excludes $231 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-16.ShortRSL3000-10-11-2016
 iM-Best10(Short Russell3000): The model’s performance YTD is -41.6%, and for the last 12 months is -28.1%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 7.7% and 9.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best10(Short Russell3000) gained 1.25% at a time when SPY gained 0.18%. Over the period 2/3/2014 to 10/10/2016 the starting capital of $100,000 would have grown to $8,303 which includes $13,057 cash and excludes $1,490 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-17.BestogaX5-10-11-2016
 iM-BestogaX5-System: The model’s out of sample performance from inception is -8.8%. The benchmark SPY performance over the same period is 7.5%. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best8(S&P 500)Tax-Eff. gained -1.49% at a time when SPY gained 0.18%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2009 would have grown to $91,219 which includes $19,946 cash and excludes $285 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-7.USMVtrade-10-11-2016Fig-7.1.USMVtrade-10-11-2016
 iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 7.2%, and for the last 12 months is 12.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 7.7% and 9.7% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 36.68% while the benchmark SPY gained 15.58% and the ETF USMV gained 25.90% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader gained -1.61% at a time when SPY gained 0.18%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $136,682 which includes $125 cash and excludes $2,327 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-9.USMVQ1-10-11-2016 Fig-9.1.USMVQ1-10-11-2016
 iM-Best12(USMV)Q1-Investor: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 13.8%, and for the last 12 months is 13.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 7.7% and 9.7% respectively. Since inception, on 1/5/2015, the model gained 18.67% while the benchmark SPY gained 11.07% and the ETF USMV gained 15.62% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q1 gained -1.47% at a time when SPY gained 0.18%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2015 would have grown to $118,673 which includes $396 cash and excludes $519 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-10.USMVQ2-10-11-2016 Fig-10.1.USMVQ2-10-11-2016
 iM-Best12(USMV)Q2-Investor: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 8.8%, and for the last 12 months is 13.7%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 7.7% and 9.7% respectively. Since inception, on 3/31/2015, the model gained 8.21% while the benchmark SPY gained 7.10% and the ETF USMV gained 11.67% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q2 gained -1.81% at a time when SPY gained 0.18%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 3/31/2015 would have grown to $108,214 which includes $311 cash and excludes $440 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-5.USMVQ3-10-11-2016 Fig-5.1.USMVQ3-10-11-2016
 iM-Best12(USMV)Q3-Investor: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 22.7%, and for the last 12 months is 20.5%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 7.7% and 9.7% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 43.92% while the benchmark SPY gained 15.58% and the ETF USMV gained 25.90% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q3 gained 0.04% at a time when SPY gained 0.18%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $143,924 which includes $5,053 cash and excludes $764 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-6.USMVQ4-10-11-2016Fig-6.1.USMVQ4-10-11-2016
 iM-Best12(USMV)Q4-Investor: Since inception, on 9/30/2014, the model gained 34.53% while the benchmark SPY gained 14.04% and the ETF USMV gained 24.16% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q4 gained 0.09% at a time when SPY gained 0.18%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 9/30/2014 would have grown to $134,526 which includes -$72 cash and excludes $610 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-10.USMV-Portfolio-vs-SPY-10-11-2016
 Average Performance of iM-Best12(USMV)Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4-Investor resulted in an excess return of 27.51% over SPY. (see iM-USMV Investor Portfolio)
Fig-3.Short-10-11-2016
 iM-Best(Short): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -7.0%, and for the last 12 months is -3.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 7.7% and 9.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best(Short) gained -0.09% at a time when SPY gained 0.18%. Over the period 1/2/2009 to 10/10/2016 the starting capital of $100,000 would have grown to $97,354 which includes $97,354 cash and excludes $20,463 spent on fees and slippage.
Posted in pmp SPY-SH

Leave a Reply

With reference to Section 202(a)(11)(D) of the Investment Advisers Act: We are Engineers and not Investment Advisers, read more ...
By the mere act of reading this page and navigating this site you acknowledge, agree to, and abide by the Terms of Use / Disclaimer