Home › pmp › pmp SPY-SH › iM-Best Reports – 11/2/2020

iM-Best Reports – 11/2/2020

Performance-wk-11-3-2020 Performance-mth-11-3-2020 Out of sample performance summary of our models for the past 1, 2, 4 and 13 week periods. The active active return indicates how the models over- or underperformed the benchmark ETF SPY. Also the YTD, and the 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year annualized returns are shown in the second table
30-im-fs-6040-11-3-2020
 iM-FlipSaver 60:40 | 20:80 – 2017: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -3.3%, and for the last 12 months is 0.2%. Over the same period the benchmark E60B40 performance was 6.3% and 9.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-FlipSaver 80:20 | 20:80 gained -1.78% at a time when SPY gained -1.67%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/16/2015 would have grown to $125,259 which includes $575 cash and excludes $1,783 spent on fees and slippage.
31-im-fs-7030-11-3-2020
 iM-FlipSaver 70:30 | 20:80 – 2017: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -5.3%, and for the last 12 months is -1.4%. Over the same period the benchmark E60B40 performance was 6.3% and 9.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-FlipSaver 70:30 | 20:80 gained -2.04% at a time when SPY gained -1.67%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/15/2015 would have grown to $125,650 which includes $429 cash and excludes $1,918 spent on fees and slippage.
32-im-fs-8020-11-3-2020
 iM-FlipSaver 80:20 | 20:80 – 2017: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -7.2%, and for the last 12 months is -3.0%. Over the same period the benchmark E60B40 performance was 6.3% and 9.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-FlipSaver 80:20 | 20:80 gained -2.30% at a time when SPY gained -1.67%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2017 would have grown to $125,955 which includes $573 cash and excludes $2,045 spent on fees and slippage.
18-5HedgeFundSelect-11-3-2020 18-1.5HedgeFundSelect-11-3-2020
 iM-5HedgeFundSelect: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 324.38% while the benchmark SPY gained 77.63% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-5HedgeFundSelect gained -4.27% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. A starting capital of $25,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $106,094 which includes $7,543 cash and excludes $1,082 spent on fees and slippage.
10-iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect-11-3-2020 10-1.iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect-11-3-2020
 iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 303.04% while the benchmark SPY gained 77.63% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect gained -4.20% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. A starting capital of $25,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $100,760 which includes $250 cash and excludes $683 spent on fees and slippage.
37-iM-Top5XLBSelect-11-3-2020
 iM-Top5(XLB)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 65.53% while the benchmark SPY gained 77.63% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLB)Select gained -1.17% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $165,530 which includes $973 cash and excludes $4,908 spent on fees and slippage.
35-iM-Top5XLISelect-11-3-2020
 iM-Top5(XLI)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 178.42% while the benchmark SPY gained 77.63% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLI)Select gained -1.17% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $278,418 which includes $129 cash and excludes $2,970 spent on fees and slippage.
27-iM-Top5XLKSelect-11-3-2020
 iM-Top5(XLK)Select: Since inception, on 1/8/2016, the model gained 284.74% while the benchmark SPY gained 77.63% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLK)Select gained -1.17% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/8/2016 would have grown to $384,743 which includes $205 cash and excludes $1,492 spent on fees and slippage.
28-iM-Top5XLPSelect-11-3-2020
 iM-Top5(XLP)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 150.13% while the benchmark SPY gained 77.63% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLP)Select gained -1.01% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $250,132 which includes $563 cash and excludes $1,014 spent on fees and slippage.
33-iM-Top5XLVSelect-11-3-2020
 iM-Top5(XLV)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 233.25% while the benchmark SPY gained 77.63% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLV)Select gained 2.39% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $333,246 which includes $1,174 cash and excludes $4,865 spent on fees and slippage.
34-iM-Top5XLUSelect-11-3-2020
 iM-Top5(XLU)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 96.98% while the benchmark SPY gained 77.63% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLU)Select gained -3.44% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $196,977 which includes -$208 cash and excludes $6,354 spent on fees and slippage.
17-DividendGrowth-11-3-2020
 iM-Dividend Growth Portfolio: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 17.7%, and for the last 12 months is 20.1%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 4.1% and 9.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Dividend Growth Portfolio gained -1.21% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $296,465 which includes $1,359 cash and excludes $5,720 spent on fees and slippage.
16-GoldMomentum-11-3-2020
 iM-Gold Momentum Timer (AU, NEM, SBSW): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 33.9%, and for the last 12 months is 56.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 4.1% and 9.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Gold Momentum Timer (AU, NEM, SBSW) gained 1.93% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to -$1,187 which includes $66,004 cash and excludes Gain to date spent on fees and slippage.
1-SPY-SH-11-3-2020
 iM-Best(SPY-SH).R1: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -17.8%, and for the last 12 months is -13.1%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 4.1% and 9.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of Best(SPY-SH) gained -2.84% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2009 would have grown to $582,713 which includes $570 cash and excludes $25,118 spent on fees and slippage.
2-Combo3-11-3-2020
 iM-Combo3.R1: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -14.5%, and for the last 12 months is -12.9%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 4.1% and 9.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Combo3.R1 gained -2.29% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/3/2014 would have grown to $151,464 which includes $4,735 cash and excludes $6,570 spent on fees and slippage.
15-Combo5-11-3-2020
 iM-Combo5: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -2.0%, and for the last 12 months is 1.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 4.1% and 9.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Combo5 gained -3.44% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/22/2016 would have grown to $150,945 which includes $1,173 cash and excludes $0 spent on fees and slippage.
8-VDIGXtrade-11-3-20208-1.VDIGXtrade-11-3-2020
 iM-Best10(VDIGX)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 0.7%, and for the last 12 months is 8.7%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 4.1% and 9.9% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 146.60% while the benchmark SPY gained 90.68% and VDIGX gained 85.52% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best10(VDIGX) gained -1.64% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $246,598 which includes $1,401 cash and excludes $3,789 spent on fees and slippage.
29-im6-cap-strg-11-3-2020
 iM 6-Stock Capital Strength Portfolio: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -5.1%, and for the last 12 months is 0.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 4.1% and 9.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM 6-Stock Capital Strength Portfolio gained -3.20% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 10/28/2016 would have grown to $168,625 which includes $121 cash and excludes $1,556 spent on fees and slippage.
7-USMVtrade-11-3-20207-1.USMVtrade-11-3-2020
 iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -14.8%, and for the last 12 months is -8.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 4.1% and 9.9% respectively. Since inception, on 6/30/2014, the model gained 100.12% while the benchmark SPY gained 90.68% and the ETF USMV gained 90.80% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader gained -4.28% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2014 would have grown to $200,124 which includes $384 cash and excludes $7,158 spent on fees and slippage.
13-MinVolUSMVInv-11-3-2020 13-1.MinVolUSMVInv-11-3-2020
 iM-Min Volatility(USMV) Investor (Tax Efficient): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 6.0%, and for the last 12 months is 7.7%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 4.1% and 9.9% respectively. Since inception, on 1/3/2013, the model gained 286.23% while the benchmark SPY gained 163.21% and the ETF USMV gained 147.92% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q1 gained -1.36% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/3/2013 would have grown to $386,228 which includes $4,759 cash and excludes $3,495 spent on fees and slippage.
5-bnd-mkt-trdr-11-3-2020
 iM-Bond Market Trader (High-Yield Bond or 10-yr Treasury Bond): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -36.6%, and for the last 12 months is -32.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 3.0% and 11.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Bond Market Trader (High-Yield Bond or 10-yr Treasury Bond) gained -0.05% at a time when BND gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 10/30/2016 would have grown to $141,623 which includes $2,899 cash and excludes $2,087 spent on fees and slippage.
3-Short-11-3-2020
 iM-Best(Short): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -5.1%, and for the last 12 months is -9.7%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 4.1% and 9.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best(Short) gained 6.53% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. Over the period 1/2/2009 to 11/2/2020 the starting capital of $100,000 would have grown to $76,309 which includes $138,497 cash and excludes $28,941 spent on fees and slippage.
25-Best2MCsETF-11-3-2020
 iM-Best2 MC-Score ETF System: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -3.5%, and for the last 12 months is -0.2%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 4.1% and 9.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Best2 MC-Score ETF System gained -2.18% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $121,296 which includes $715 cash and excludes $1,386 spent on fees and slippage.
26-Best4MCsVang-11-3-2020
 iM-Best4 MC-Score Vanguard System: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -4.1%, and for the last 12 months is -2.5%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 4.1% and 9.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Best4 MC-Score Vanguard System gained -1.30% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $124,451 which includes $1,053 cash and excludes $00 spent on fees and slippage.
20-imc-spy-ief-11-3-2020
 iM-Composite (SPY-IEF) Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -15.5%, and for the last 12 months is -10.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 4.1% and 9.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Composite (SPY-IEF) Timer gained -2.70% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $137,966 which includes $603 cash and excludes $3,984 spent on fees and slippage.
22-imc-gld-stk-bnd-11-3-2020
 iM-Composite(Gold-Stocks-Bond) Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 11.6%, and for the last 12 months is 14.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 4.1% and 9.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Composite(Gold-Stocks-Bond) Timer gained -3.44% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $145,368 which includes -$662 cash and excludes $5,636 spent on fees and slippage.
23-iM-lo-turn-over-11-3-2020
 iM-Low Turnover Composite Timer Combo: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -9.5%, and for the last 12 months is -7.2%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 4.1% and 9.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Low Turnover Composite Timer Combo gained -0.83% at a time when SPY gained -2.71%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 3/24/2017 would have grown to $101,849 which includes $1,377 cash and excludes $2,151 spent on fees and slippage.
Posted in pmp SPY-SH

Leave a Reply

With reference to Section 202(a)(11)(D) of the Investment Advisers Act: We are Engineers and not Investment Advisers, read more ...
By the mere act of reading this page and navigating this site you acknowledge, agree to, and abide by the Terms of Use / Disclaimer