iM-Best Reports – 7/16/2018

Performance-wk-7-17-2018 Performance-mth-7-17-2018 Out of sample performance summary of our models for the past 1, 2, 4 and 13 week periods. The active active return indicates how the models over- or underperformed the benchmark ETF SPY. Also the YTD, and the 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year annualized returns are shown in the second table
fig1-SPY-SH-7-17-2018
iM-Best(SPY-SH).R1: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 5.1%, and for the last 12 months is 15.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of Best(SPY-SH) gained 0.52% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2009 would have grown to $591,309 which includes -$7,596 cash and excludes $17,694 spent on fees and slippage.
fig-2-Combo3-7-17-2018
iM-Combo3.R1: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 7.3%, and for the last 12 months is 22.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Combo3.R1 gained 0.56% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/3/2014 would have grown to $169,301 which includes $331 cash and excludes $4,006 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-15.Combo5-7-17-2018
iM-Combo5: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 9.1%, and for the last 12 months is 24.7%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Combo5 gained 0.87% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/22/2016 would have grown to $139,342 which includes $1,724 cash and excludes $983 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-8.VDIGXtrade-7-17-2018Fig-8.1.VDIGXtrade-7-17-2018
iM-Best10(VDIGX)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 4.6%, and for the last 12 months is 12.9%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 86.47% while the benchmark SPY gained 54.47% and VDIGX gained 47.12% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best10(VDIGX) gained 0.99% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $186,262 which includes $171 cash and excludes $2,299 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-4.Bestoga3-7-17-2018
iM-BESTOGA-3: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -14.2%, and for the last 12 months is -12.5%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-BESTOGA-3 gained -0.58% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/3/2014 would have grown to $198,979 which includes $1,394 cash and excludes $2,787 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-18.HiD-LoV-7-17-2018
iM-Best7(HiD-LoV): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -0.5%, and for the last 12 months is 7.0%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-BESTOGA-3 gained -0.11% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $112,671 which includes $948 cash and excludes $2,050 spent on fees and slippage.
fig29im6-cap-strg-7-17-2018
iM 6-Stock Capital Strength Portfolio: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 2.1%, and for the last 12 months is 20.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM 6-Stock Capital Strength Portfolio gained 0.10% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 10/28/2016 would have grown to $154,713 which includes $1,777 cash and excludes $704 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-17.BestogaX5-7-17-2018
iM-BestogaX5-System: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 4.2%, and for the last 12 months is 5.5%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-BestogaX5-System gained 0.08% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 3/28/2016 would have grown to $116,754 which includes $639 cash and excludes $1,256 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-7.USMVtrade-7-17-2018Fig-7.1.USMVtrade-7-17-2018
iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 6.5%, and for the last 12 months is 19.0%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Since inception, on 6/30/2014, the model gained 82.16% while the benchmark SPY gained 54.47% and the ETF USMV gained 58.60% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader gained -0.21% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2014 would have grown to $181,949 which includes $244 cash and excludes $4,334 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-9.USMVQ1-7-17-2018 Fig-9.1.USMVQ1-7-17-2018
iM-Best12(USMV)Q1-Investor: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 7.9%, and for the last 12 months is 20.6%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Since inception, on 1/5/2015, the model gained 74.16% while the benchmark SPY gained 48.44% and the ETF USMV gained 45.65% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q1 gained -0.35% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2015 would have grown to $173,875 which includes $316 cash and excludes $1,196 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-10.USMVQ2-7-17-2018 Fig-10.1.USMVQ2-7-17-2018
iM-Best12(USMV)Q2-Investor: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 8.3%, and for the last 12 months is 16.1%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Since inception, on 3/30/2015, the model gained 46.82% while the benchmark SPY gained 43.13% and the ETF USMV gained 40.68% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q2 gained 0.93% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 3/30/2015 would have grown to $146,629 which includes $241 cash and excludes $1,014 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-5.USMVQ3-7-17-2018 Fig-5.1.USMVQ3-7-17-2018
iM-Best12(USMV)Q3-Investor: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 2.1%, and for the last 12 months is 12.7%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 81.40% while the benchmark SPY gained 54.47% and the ETF USMV gained 58.60% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q3 gained 0.15% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $181,060 which includes $312 cash and excludes $1,538 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-6.USMVQ4-7-17-2018Fig-6.1.USMVQ4-7-17-2018
iM-Best12(USMV)Q4-Investor: Since inception, on 9/29/2014, the model gained 89.01% while the benchmark SPY gained 52.13% and the ETF USMV gained 56.41% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q4 gained -0.06% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 9/29/2014 would have grown to $188,914 which includes $230 cash and excludes $1,340 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-10.USMV-Portfolio-vs-SPY-7-17-2018
Average Performance of iM-Best12(USMV)Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4-Investor resulted in an excess return of 42.42% over SPY. (see iM-USMV Investor Portfolio)
fig-3-Short-7-17-2018
iM-Best(Short): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -3.0%, and for the last 12 months is -11.9%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best(Short) gained 0.49% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. Over the period 1/2/2009 to 7/16/2018 the starting capital of $100,000 would have grown to $88,531 which includes $88,531 cash and excludes $24,400 spent on fees and slippage.
fig25-Best2MCsETF-7-17-2018
iM-Best2 MC-Score ETF System: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -1.3%, and for the last 12 months is 5.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Best2 MC-Score ETF System gained 0.81% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $110,920 which includes $1,980 cash and excludes $115 spent on fees and slippage.
fig26-Best4MCsVang-7-17-2018
iM-Best4 MC-Score Vanguard System: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -0.3%, and for the last 12 months is 4.6%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Best4 MC-Score Vanguard System gained 0.23% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $110,487 which includes $4,783 cash and excludes $00 spent on fees and slippage.
fig21-imc-sh-rsp-7-17-2018
iM-Composite (SH-RSP) Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 3.6%, and for the last 12 months is 12.6%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Composite (SH-RSP) Timer gained -0.17% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $134,720 which includes $3,223 cash and excludes $513 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-20-imc-spy-ief-7-17-2018
iM-Composite (SPY-IEF) Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 5.5%, and for the last 12 months is 16.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Composite (SPY-IEF) Timer gained 0.51% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $140,036 which includes $2,042 cash and excludes $1,390 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-12-vix-zif-7-17-2018
iM-VIX Timer with ZIV: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 29.5%, and for the last 12 months is 70.7%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-VIX Timer with ZIV gained 2.17% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $227,874 which includes $77 cash and excludes $2,429 spent on fees and slippage.
fig22-imc-gld-stk-bnd-7-17-2018
iM-Composite(Gold-Stocks-Bond) Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -4.9%, and for the last 12 months is 0.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Composite(Gold-Stocks-Bond) Timer gained -1.29% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $122,456 which includes $65 cash and excludes $1,955 spent on fees and slippage.
fig23iM-lo-turn-over-7-17-2018
iM-Low Turnover Composite Timer Combo: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -1.0%, and for the last 12 months is 3.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Low Turnover Composite Timer Combo gained -0.69% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 3/24/27 would have grown to $105,969 which includes $2,318 cash and excludes $74 spent on fees and slippage.
fig28-im-min-dd-7-17-2018
iM-Min Drawdown Combo: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 0.5%, and for the last 12 months is 7.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Min Drawdown Combo gained -0.20% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 4/5/2017 would have grown to $108,291 which includes $3,128 cash and excludes $317 spent on fees and slippage.
fig27-im-5etf-trader-7-17-2018
iM-5ETF Trader (includes leveraged ETFs): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 11.6%, and for the last 12 months is 32.5%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-5ETF Trader (includes leveraged ETFs) gained 0.38% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 10/30/2016 would have grown to $181,670 which includes $1,539 cash and excludes $1,030 spent on fees and slippage.
fig24-im-std-5etf-trader-7-17-2018
iM-Standard 5ETF Trader (excludes leveraged ETFs): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 4.3%, and for the last 12 months is 14.1%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 5.6% and 15.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Standard 5ETF Trader (excludes leveraged ETFs) gained 0.22% at a time when SPY gained 0.52%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 10/30/2016 would have grown to $130,918 which includes $2,986 cash and excludes $880 spent on fees and slippage.
Posted in pmp SPY-SH

Leave a Reply

With reference to Section 202(a)(11)(D) of the Investment Advisers Act: We are Engineers and not Investment Advisers, read more ...
By the mere act of reading this page and navigating this site you acknowledge, agree to, and abide by the Terms of Use / Disclaimer