Home › pmp › pmp SPY-SH › iM-Best Reports – 5/31/2016

iM-Best Reports – 5/31/2016

Performance-wk-6-1-2016 Performance-mth-6-1-2016 Out of sample performance summary of our models for the past 1, 2, 4 and 13 week periods. The active active return indicates how the models over- or underperformed the benchmark ETF SPY. Also the YTD, and the 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year annualized returns are shown in the second table
Fig-1.SPY-SH-6-1-2016
 iM-Best(SPY-SH).R1: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -1.3%, and for the last 12 months is 21.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 3.5% and 1.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of Best(SPY-SH) gained 2.30% at a time when SPY gained 2.26%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2009 would have grown to $429,253 which includes -$7,214 cash and excludes $15,358 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-2.Combo3-6-1-2016
 iM-Combo3.R1: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -8.2%, and for the last 12 months is -0.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 3.5% and 1.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Combo3.R1 gained -0.06% at a time when SPY gained 2.26%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/3/2014 would have grown to $121,520 which includes -$519 cash and excludes $2,857 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-15.Combo5-6-1-2016
 iM-Combo5: The model’s out of sample performance from inception is -1.9%. The benchmark SPY performance over the same period is 9.9%. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Combo5 gained -0.03% at a time when SPY gained 2.26%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/22/2016 would have grown to $98,146 which includes $19,794 cash and excludes $235 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-14.Best8TaxEff-6-1-2016
 The iM-Best8(S&P500 Min Vol)Tax-Efficient The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 1.2%, and for the last 12 months is -1.2%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 3.5% and 1.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best8(S&P 500)Tax-Eff. gained -0.11% at a time when SPY gained 2.26%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2009 would have grown to $450,504 which includes $180,483 cash and excludes $6,766 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-8.VDIGXtrade-6-1-2016Fig-8.1.VDIGXtrade-6-1-2016
 iM-Best10(VDIGX)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 2.7%, and for the last 12 months is 11.0%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 3.5% and 1.5% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 29.48% while the benchmark SPY gained 11.06% and the ETF VDIGX gained 14.01% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best10(VDIGX) gained 2.27% at a time when SPY gained 2.26%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $129,484 which includes $117 cash and excludes $1,130 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-4.Bestoga3-6-1-2016
 iM-BESTOGA-3: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 8.9%, and for the last 12 months is 37.0%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 3.5% and 1.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-BESTOGA-3 gained 1.07% at a time when SPY gained 2.26%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/3/2014 would have grown to $200,120 which includes $17,365 cash and excludes $767 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-16.ShortRSL3000-6-1-2016
 iM-Best10(Short Russell3000): The model’s performance YTD is -29.0%, and for the last 12 months is -6.0%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 3.5% and 1.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best10(Short Russell3000) gained -3.87% at a time when SPY gained 2.26%. Over the period 2/3/2014 to 5/31/2016 the starting capital of $100,000 would have grown to $10,087 which includes $15,738 cash and excludes $1,232 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-17.BestogaX5-6-1-2016
 iM-BestogaX5-System: The model’s out of sample performance from inception is -5.9%. The benchmark SPY performance over the same period is 3.2%. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best8(S&P 500)Tax-Eff. gained -0.89% at a time when SPY gained 2.26%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2009 would have grown to $94,154 which includes $20,770 cash and excludes $82 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-13.Best3x4-6-1-2016
 iM-Best3x4(S&P 500 Min Vol): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -12.7%, and since inception -10.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 3.5% and 1.2% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best3x4 gained 0.62% at a time when SPY gained 2.26%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/15/2015 would have grown to $89,715 which includes $86 cash and excludes $1,268 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-12.Best2x4-6-1-2016
 iM-Best2x4(S&P 500 Min Vol): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -2.4%, and since inception -3.6%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 3.5% and 1.3% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best2x4 gained -0.20% at a time when SPY gained 2.26%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/16/2015 would have grown to $96,405 which includes $271 cash and excludes $966 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-7.USMVtrade-6-1-2016Fig-7.1.USMVtrade-6-1-2016
 iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 6.0%, and for the last 12 months is 5.9%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 3.5% and 1.5% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 35.24% while the benchmark SPY gained 11.06% and the ETF USMV gained 23.72% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader gained 2.82% at a time when SPY gained 2.26%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $135,241 which includes $157 cash and excludes $1,954 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-9.USMVQ1-6-1-2016 Fig-9.1.USMVQ1-6-1-2016
 iM-Best12(USMV)Q1-Investor: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 9.2%, and for the last 12 months is 7.5%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 3.5% and 1.5% respectively. Since inception, on 1/5/2015, the model gained 13.93% while the benchmark SPY gained 6.72% and the ETF USMV gained 13.62% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q1 gained 1.57% at a time when SPY gained 2.26%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2015 would have grown to $113,928 which includes $137 cash and excludes $437 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-10.USMVQ2-6-1-2016 Fig-10.1.USMVQ2-6-1-2016
 iM-Best12(USMV)Q2-Investor: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 9.5%, and for the last 12 months is 10.2%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 3.5% and 1.5% respectively. Since inception, on 3/31/2015, the model gained 8.96% while the benchmark SPY gained 2.91% and the ETF USMV gained 9.74% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q2 gained 2.09% at a time when SPY gained 2.26%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 3/31/2015 would have grown to $108,959 which includes $133 cash and excludes $352 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-5.USMVQ3-6-1-2016 Fig-5.1.USMVQ3-6-1-2016
 iM-Best12(USMV)Q3-Investor: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 16.6%, and for the last 12 months is 9.6%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 3.5% and 1.5% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 36.77% while the benchmark SPY gained 11.06% and the ETF USMV gained 23.72% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q3 gained 1.16% at a time when SPY gained 2.26%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $136,766 which includes $662 cash and excludes $564 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-6.USMVQ4-6-1-2016Fig-6.1.USMVQ4-6-1-2016
 iM-Best12(USMV)Q4-Investor: Since inception, on 9/30/2014, the model gained 26.31% while the benchmark SPY gained 9.58% and the ETF USMV gained 22.01% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q4 gained 1.33% at a time when SPY gained 2.26%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 9/30/2014 would have grown to $126,314 which includes $695 cash and excludes $485 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-10.USMV-Portfolio-vs-SPY-6-1-2016
 Average Performance of iM-Best12(USMV)Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4-Investor resulted in an excess return of 25.20% over SPY. (see iM-USMV Investor Portfolio)
Fig-3.Short-6-1-2016
 iM-Best(Short): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -6.2%, and for the last 12 months is -7.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 3.5% and 1.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best(Short) gained -2.74% at a time when SPY gained 2.26%. Over the period 1/2/2009 to 5/31/2016 the starting capital of $100,000 would have grown to $98,234 which includes $117,817 cash and excludes $19,199 spent on fees and slippage.
Posted in pmp SPY-SH

Leave a Reply

With reference to Section 202(a)(11)(D) of the Investment Advisers Act: We are Engineers and not Investment Advisers, read more ...
By the mere act of reading this page and navigating this site you acknowledge, agree to, and abide by the Terms of Use / Disclaimer