iM-Best Reports – 9/8/2025

Performance-wk-9-9-2025 Performance-mth-9-9-2025 Out of sample performance summary of our models for the past 1, 2, 4 and 13 week periods. The active active return indicates how the models over- or underperformed the benchmark ETF SPY. Also the YTD, and the 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year annualized returns are shown in the second table
23-enh-inflation-timer-9-9-2025
iM-Inflation Attuned Multi-Model Market Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 18.0%, and for the last 12 months is 31.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.4% and 21.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Inflation Attuned Multi-Model Market Timer gained 0.50% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 3/24/2017 would have grown to $145,908,648 which includes -$476,231 cash and excludes $3,953,990 spent on fees and slippage.
12-CB-LEIg-9-9-2025
iM-Conference Board LEIg Timer: The model’s performance YTD is 14.3%, and for the last 12 months is 7.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 20.1% and 9.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Conference Board LEIg Timer gained -0.49% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 4/5/2017 would have grown to $633,571 which includes $18,974 cash and excludes $763 spent on fees and slippage.
30-im-fs-6040-9-9-2025
iM-FlipSaver 60:40 | 20:80 – 2017: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 3.7%, and for the last 12 months is 5.1%. Over the same period the benchmark E60B40 performance was 9.8% and 14.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-FlipSaver 80:20 | 20:80 gained 0.59% at a time when SPY gained 0.87%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/16/2015 would have grown to $177,740 which includes -$55 cash and excludes $5,249 spent on fees and slippage.
31-im-fs-7030-9-9-2025
iM-FlipSaver 70:30 | 20:80 – 2017: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 3.1%, and for the last 12 months is 5.1%. Over the same period the benchmark E60B40 performance was 9.8% and 14.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-FlipSaver 70:30 | 20:80 gained 0.58% at a time when SPY gained 0.87%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/15/2015 would have grown to $185,126 which includes -$14 cash and excludes $5,507 spent on fees and slippage.
32-im-fs-8020-9-9-2025
iM-FlipSaver 80:20 | 20:80 – 2017: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 2.5%, and for the last 12 months is 5.0%. Over the same period the benchmark E60B40 performance was 9.8% and 14.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-FlipSaver 80:20 | 20:80 gained 0.57% at a time when SPY gained 0.87%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2017 would have grown to $192,425 which includes -$5 cash and excludes $5,756 spent on fees and slippage.
18-5HedgeFundSelect-9-9-2025 18-1.5HedgeFundSelect-9-9-2025
iM-5HedgeFundSelect: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 786.58% while the benchmark SPY gained 273.37% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-5HedgeFundSelect gained 5.19% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $25,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $221,646 which includes $3,056 cash and excludes $2,817 spent on fees and slippage.
10-iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect-9-9-2025 10-1.iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect-9-9-2025
iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 666.95% while the benchmark SPY gained 273.37% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect gained 0.33% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $25,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $191,738 which includes $723 cash and excludes $1,852 spent on fees and slippage.
38-iM-Top5QQQSelect-9-9-202538-1.iM-Top5QQQSelect-9-9-2025
iM-Top5(QQQ)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 1175.84% while the benchmark SPY gained 273.37% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(QQQ)Select gained 1.54% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $1,275,840 which includes $1,772 cash and excludes $20,809 spent on fees and slippage.
37-iM-Top5XLBSelect-9-9-202537-1.iM-Top5XLBSelect-9-9-2025
iM-Top5(XLB)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 220.50% while the benchmark SPY gained 273.37% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLB)Select gained -0.66% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $320,499 which includes $1,219 cash and excludes $16,456 spent on fees and slippage.
35-iM-Top5XLISelect-9-9-202535-1.iM-Top5XLISelect-9-9-2025
iM-Top5(XLI)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 412.13% while the benchmark SPY gained 273.37% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLI)Select gained 0.29% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $512,127 which includes -$4,099 cash and excludes $7,998 spent on fees and slippage.
27-iM-Top5XLKSelect-9-9-202527-1.iM-Top5XLKSelect-9-9-2025
iM-Top5(XLK)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 843.02% while the benchmark SPY gained 273.37% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLK)Select gained 1.59% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $943,023 which includes $2,054 cash and excludes $3,016 spent on fees and slippage.
28-iM-Top5XLPSelect-9-9-202528-1.iM-Top5XLPSelect-9-9-2025
iM-Top5(XLP)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 310.85% while the benchmark SPY gained 273.37% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLP)Select gained 1.82% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $410,852 which includes $1,473 cash and excludes $2,976 spent on fees and slippage.
33-iM-Top5XLVSelect-9-9-202533-1.iM-Top5XLVSelect-9-9-2025
iM-Top5(XLV)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 393.35% while the benchmark SPY gained 273.37% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLV)Select gained 0.33% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $493,351 which includes $1,886 cash and excludes $18,748 spent on fees and slippage.
34-iM-Top5XLUSelect-9-9-202534-1.iM-Top5XLUSelect-9-9-2025
iM-Top5(XLU)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 179.87% while the benchmark SPY gained 273.37% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLU)Select gained -2.52% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $279,868 which includes -$1,274 cash and excludes $17,411 spent on fees and slippage.
36-iM-Top5XLYSelect-9-9-202536-1.iM-Top5XLYSelect-9-9-2025
iM-Top5(XLY)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 346.39% while the benchmark SPY gained 273.37% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLY)Select gained 3.76% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $446,389 which includes $1,847 cash and excludes $7,590 spent on fees and slippage.
39-Top5SeasonalCombo-9-9-2025
iM-Seasonal Super-Sectors (Top5 combo) : Since inception, on 11/17/2020, the model gained 89.20% while the benchmark SPY gained 93.82% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Seasonal Super-Sectors (Top5 combo) gained 0.61% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 11/17/2020 would have grown to $189,197 which includes $849 cash and excludes $00 spent on fees and slippage.
17-DividendGrowth-9-9-2025
iM-Dividend Growth Portfolio: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 11.0%, and for the last 12 months is 15.5%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.4% and 21.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Dividend Growth Portfolio gained 1.22% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $537,394 which includes $3,283 cash and excludes $14,246 spent on fees and slippage.
16-GoldMomentum-9-9-2025
iM-Gold Momentum Timer (AU, NEM, SBSW): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 179.4%, and for the last 12 months is 115.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.4% and 21.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Gold Momentum Timer (AU, NEM, SBSW) gained 2.05% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to -$163,018 which includes $171,598 cash and excludes Gain to date spent on fees and slippage.
4-ModSumYieldCurve-9-9-2025
iM-ModSum/YieldCurve Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 19.0%, and for the last 12 months is 22.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.4% and 21.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-PortSum/YieldCurve Timer gained 0.57% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/1/2016 would have grown to $381,870 which includes -$139 cash and excludes $2,213 spent on fees and slippage.
1-SPY-SH-9-9-2025
iM-Best(SPY-SH).R1: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -9.4%, and for the last 12 months is -1.1%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.4% and 21.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of Best(SPY-SH) gained 0.58% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2009 would have grown to $65,262 which includes $379 cash and excludes $2,818 spent on fees and slippage.
2-Combo3-9-9-2025
iM-Combo3.R1: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -8.1%, and for the last 12 months is -2.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.4% and 21.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Combo3.R1 gained 0.45% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/3/2014 would have grown to $193,878 which includes $4,820 cash and excludes $8,515 spent on fees and slippage.
8-VDIGXtrade-9-9-20258-1.VDIGXtrade-9-9-2025
iM-Best10(VDIGX)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 5.7%, and for the last 12 months is 6.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.4% and 21.6% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 267.51% while the benchmark SPY gained 300.79% and VDIGX gained 67.04% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best10(VDIGX) gained -0.76% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $367,512 which includes $652 cash and excludes $5,481 spent on fees and slippage.
29-im6-cap-strg-9-9-2025
iM 6-Stock Capital Strength Portfolio: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -4.6%, and for the last 12 months is -0.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.4% and 21.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM 6-Stock Capital Strength Portfolio gained -4.15% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 10/28/2016 would have grown to $255,489 which includes $2,462 cash and excludes $4,120 spent on fees and slippage.
7-USMVtrade-9-9-20257-1.USMVtrade-9-9-2025
iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 20.5%, and for the last 12 months is 24.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.4% and 21.6% respectively. Since inception, on 6/30/2014, the model gained 312.03% while the benchmark SPY gained 300.79% and the ETF USMV gained 210.20% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader gained 1.81% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2014 would have grown to $412,032 which includes $793 cash and excludes $8,600 spent on fees and slippage.
13-MinVolUSMVInv-9-9-2025 13-1.MinVolUSMVInv-9-9-2025
iM-Min Volatility(USMV) Investor (Tax Efficient): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 21.2%, and for the last 12 months is 20.2%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.4% and 21.6% respectively. Since inception, on 1/3/2013, the model gained 1071.06% while the benchmark SPY gained 453.26% and the ETF USMV gained 453.26% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q1 gained 0.88% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/3/2013 would have grown to $1,171,056 which includes $1,871 cash and excludes $14,159 spent on fees and slippage.
5-bnd-mkt-trdr-9-9-2025
iM-Bond Market Trader (High-Yield Bond or 10-yr Treasury Bond): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 6.1%, and for the last 12 months is 2.0%. Over the same period the benchmark BND performance was 6.3% and 3.1% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Bond Market Trader (High-Yield Bond or 10-yr Treasury Bond) gained 0.50% at a time when BND gained 1.29%. A starting capital of $10,000 at inception on 1/3/2000 would have grown to $148,670 which includes -$348 cash and excludes $2,855 spent on fees and slippage.
4-ModSumYieldCurve-9-9-2025
iM-ModSum/YieldCurve Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 19.0%, and for the last 12 months is 22.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.4% and 21.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-PortSum/YieldCurve Timer gained 0.57% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/1/2016 would have grown to $381,870 which includes -$139 cash and excludes $2,213 spent on fees and slippage.
25-Best2MCsETF-9-9-2025
iM-Best2 MC-Score ETF System: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 7.3%, and for the last 12 months is 5.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.4% and 21.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Best2 MC-Score ETF System gained -0.23% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $189,301 which includes $157 cash and excludes $5,746 spent on fees and slippage.
26-Best4MCsVang-9-9-2025
iM-Best4 MC-Score Vanguard System: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 5.6%, and for the last 12 months is 0.9%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.4% and 21.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Best4 MC-Score Vanguard System gained -0.22% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $181,548 which includes $1,043 cash and excludes $00 spent on fees and slippage.
20-imc-spy-ief-9-9-2025
iM-Composite (SPY-IEF) Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 0.3%, and for the last 12 months is 1.5%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.4% and 21.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Composite (SPY-IEF) Timer gained 0.40% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $215,928 which includes -$75 cash and excludes $8,216 spent on fees and slippage.
22-imc-gld-stk-bnd-9-9-2025
iM-Composite(Gold-Stocks-Bond) Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 38.3%, and for the last 12 months is 45.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 11.4% and 21.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Composite(Gold-Stocks-Bond) Timer gained 5.27% at a time when SPY gained 0.59%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $341,064 which includes $36 cash and excludes $9,190 spent on fees and slippage.
Posted in pmp SPY-SH

Leave a Reply

With reference to Section 202(a)(11)(D) of the Investment Advisers Act: We are Engineers and not Investment Advisers, read more ...
By the mere act of reading this page and navigating this site you acknowledge, agree to, and abide by the Terms of Use / Disclaimer