iM-Best Reports – 7/29/2025

Performance-wk-7-29-2025 Performance-mth-7-29-2025 Out of sample performance summary of our models for the past 1, 2, 4 and 13 week periods. The active active return indicates how the models over- or underperformed the benchmark ETF SPY. Also the YTD, and the 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year annualized returns are shown in the second table
23-enh-inflation-timer-7-29-2025
iM-Inflation Attuned Multi-Model Market Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 16.6%, and for the last 12 months is 15.9%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 9.3% and 18.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Inflation Attuned Multi-Model Market Timer gained 1.39% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 3/24/2017 would have grown to $144,126,883 which includes -$476,231 cash and excludes $3,953,990 spent on fees and slippage.
12-CB-LEIg-7-29-2025
iM-Conference Board LEIg Timer: The model’s performance YTD is 14.3%, and for the last 12 months is 7.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 20.1% and 9.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Conference Board LEIg Timer gained 1.10% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 4/5/2017 would have grown to $624,775 which includes $18,974 cash and excludes $763 spent on fees and slippage.
30-im-fs-6040-7-29-2025
iM-FlipSaver 60:40 | 20:80 – 2017: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 1.6%, and for the last 12 months is 5.4%. Over the same period the benchmark E60B40 performance was 7.4% and 13.0% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-FlipSaver 80:20 | 20:80 gained 0.70% at a time when SPY gained 0.75%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/16/2015 would have grown to $174,064 which includes $656 cash and excludes $4,895 spent on fees and slippage.
31-im-fs-7030-7-29-2025
iM-FlipSaver 70:30 | 20:80 – 2017: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 1.0%, and for the last 12 months is 5.4%. Over the same period the benchmark E60B40 performance was 7.4% and 13.0% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-FlipSaver 70:30 | 20:80 gained 0.86% at a time when SPY gained 0.75%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/15/2015 would have grown to $181,341 which includes $805 cash and excludes $5,139 spent on fees and slippage.
32-im-fs-8020-7-29-2025
iM-FlipSaver 80:20 | 20:80 – 2017: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 0.4%, and for the last 12 months is 5.4%. Over the same period the benchmark E60B40 performance was 7.4% and 13.0% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-FlipSaver 80:20 | 20:80 gained 1.02% at a time when SPY gained 0.75%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2017 would have grown to $188,536 which includes $933 cash and excludes $5,373 spent on fees and slippage.
18-5HedgeFundSelect-7-29-2025 18-1.5HedgeFundSelect-7-29-2025
iM-5HedgeFundSelect: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 728.06% while the benchmark SPY gained 266.52% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-5HedgeFundSelect gained 0.95% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $25,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $207,015 which includes -$171 cash and excludes $2,663 spent on fees and slippage.
10-iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect-7-29-2025 10-1.iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect-7-29-2025
iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 636.73% while the benchmark SPY gained 266.52% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect gained 0.52% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $25,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $177,735 which includes -$6,556 cash and excludes $1,770 spent on fees and slippage.
38-iM-Top5QQQSelect-7-29-202538-1.iM-Top5QQQSelect-7-29-2025
iM-Top5(QQQ)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 1201.42% while the benchmark SPY gained 266.52% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(QQQ)Select gained -0.20% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $1,301,420 which includes $5,178 cash and excludes $19,758 spent on fees and slippage.
37-iM-Top5XLBSelect-7-29-202537-1.iM-Top5XLBSelect-7-29-2025
iM-Top5(XLB)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 215.56% while the benchmark SPY gained 266.52% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLB)Select gained 0.97% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $315,563 which includes $43 cash and excludes $16,044 spent on fees and slippage.
35-iM-Top5XLISelect-7-29-202535-1.iM-Top5XLISelect-7-29-2025
iM-Top5(XLI)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 419.67% while the benchmark SPY gained 266.52% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLI)Select gained 2.99% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $519,670 which includes $4,884 cash and excludes $7,802 spent on fees and slippage.
27-iM-Top5XLKSelect-7-29-202527-1.iM-Top5XLKSelect-7-29-2025
iM-Top5(XLK)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 803.20% while the benchmark SPY gained 266.52% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLK)Select gained 0.41% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $903,196 which includes $3,104 cash and excludes $2,448 spent on fees and slippage.
28-iM-Top5XLPSelect-7-29-202528-1.iM-Top5XLPSelect-7-29-2025
iM-Top5(XLP)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 286.22% while the benchmark SPY gained 266.52% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLP)Select gained 1.15% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $386,222 which includes $2,476 cash and excludes $2,939 spent on fees and slippage.
33-iM-Top5XLVSelect-7-29-202533-1.iM-Top5XLVSelect-7-29-2025
iM-Top5(XLV)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 387.35% while the benchmark SPY gained 266.52% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLV)Select gained 3.48% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $487,353 which includes $6,194 cash and excludes $18,088 spent on fees and slippage.
34-iM-Top5XLUSelect-7-29-202534-1.iM-Top5XLUSelect-7-29-2025
iM-Top5(XLU)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 183.55% while the benchmark SPY gained 266.52% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLU)Select gained 0.68% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $283,551 which includes -$961 cash and excludes $17,018 spent on fees and slippage.
36-iM-Top5XLYSelect-7-29-202536-1.iM-Top5XLYSelect-7-29-2025
iM-Top5(XLY)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 310.66% while the benchmark SPY gained 266.52% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLY)Select gained 3.59% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $410,659 which includes $1,022 cash and excludes $7,566 spent on fees and slippage.
39-Top5SeasonalCombo-7-29-2025
iM-Seasonal Super-Sectors (Top5 combo) : Since inception, on 11/17/2020, the model gained 85.70% while the benchmark SPY gained 90.26% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Seasonal Super-Sectors (Top5 combo) gained 0.49% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 11/17/2020 would have grown to $185,705 which includes $1,989 cash and excludes $00 spent on fees and slippage.
17-DividendGrowth-7-29-2025
iM-Dividend Growth Portfolio: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 8.1%, and for the last 12 months is 9.0%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 9.3% and 18.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Dividend Growth Portfolio gained 1.76% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $523,456 which includes $1,801 cash and excludes $13,865 spent on fees and slippage.
16-GoldMomentum-7-29-2025
iM-Gold Momentum Timer (AU, NEM, SBSW): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 189.6%, and for the last 12 months is 130.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 9.3% and 18.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Gold Momentum Timer (AU, NEM, SBSW) gained -2.33% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to -$91 which includes $150,757 cash and excludes Gain to date spent on fees and slippage.
4-ModSumYieldCurve-7-29-2025
iM-ModSum/YieldCurve Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 16.9%, and for the last 12 months is 25.0%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 9.3% and 18.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-PortSum/YieldCurve Timer gained 1.29% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/1/2016 would have grown to $374,963 which includes $1,716 cash and excludes $2,092 spent on fees and slippage.
1-SPY-SH-7-29-2025
iM-Best(SPY-SH).R1: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -11.0%, and for the last 12 months is -3.6%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 9.3% and 18.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of Best(SPY-SH) gained 1.29% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2009 would have grown to $64,073 which includes $379 cash and excludes $2,818 spent on fees and slippage.
2-Combo3-7-29-2025
iM-Combo3.R1: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -9.2%, and for the last 12 months is -4.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 9.3% and 18.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Combo3.R1 gained -0.01% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/3/2014 would have grown to $191,393 which includes $6,482 cash and excludes $8,513 spent on fees and slippage.
8-VDIGXtrade-7-29-20258-1.VDIGXtrade-7-29-2025
iM-Best10(VDIGX)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 5.9%, and for the last 12 months is 9.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 9.3% and 18.4% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 268.23% while the benchmark SPY gained 293.45% and VDIGX gained 64.96% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best10(VDIGX) gained 1.17% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $368,232 which includes $969 cash and excludes $5,464 spent on fees and slippage.
29-im6-cap-strg-7-29-2025
iM 6-Stock Capital Strength Portfolio: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -1.8%, and for the last 12 months is -2.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 9.3% and 18.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM 6-Stock Capital Strength Portfolio gained 3.99% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 10/28/2016 would have grown to $263,088 which includes $309 cash and excludes $4,120 spent on fees and slippage.
7-USMVtrade-7-29-20257-1.USMVtrade-7-29-2025
iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 16.3%, and for the last 12 months is 23.0%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 9.3% and 18.4% respectively. Since inception, on 6/30/2014, the model gained 297.75% while the benchmark SPY gained 293.45% and the ETF USMV gained 208.06% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader gained 0.83% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2014 would have grown to $397,748 which includes $566 cash and excludes $8,600 spent on fees and slippage.
13-MinVolUSMVInv-7-29-2025 13-1.MinVolUSMVInv-7-29-2025
iM-Min Volatility(USMV) Investor (Tax Efficient): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 11.2%, and for the last 12 months is 11.2%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 9.3% and 18.4% respectively. Since inception, on 1/3/2013, the model gained 974.42% while the benchmark SPY gained 443.12% and the ETF USMV gained 443.12% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q1 gained 1.63% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/3/2013 would have grown to $1,074,419 which includes $3,342 cash and excludes $13,967 spent on fees and slippage.
5-bnd-mkt-trdr-7-29-2025
iM-Bond Market Trader (High-Yield Bond or 10-yr Treasury Bond): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 4.5%, and for the last 12 months is 4.5%. Over the same period the benchmark BND performance was 3.5% and 3.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Bond Market Trader (High-Yield Bond or 10-yr Treasury Bond) gained 0.11% at a time when BND gained -0.08%. A starting capital of $10,000 at inception on 1/3/2000 would have grown to $146,441 which includes $22 cash and excludes $2,792 spent on fees and slippage.
4-ModSumYieldCurve-7-29-2025
iM-ModSum/YieldCurve Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 16.9%, and for the last 12 months is 25.0%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 9.3% and 18.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-PortSum/YieldCurve Timer gained 1.29% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/1/2016 would have grown to $374,963 which includes $1,716 cash and excludes $2,092 spent on fees and slippage.
25-Best2MCsETF-7-29-2025
iM-Best2 MC-Score ETF System: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 7.0%, and for the last 12 months is 10.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 9.3% and 18.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Best2 MC-Score ETF System gained 0.11% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $188,748 which includes $103 cash and excludes $5,746 spent on fees and slippage.
26-Best4MCsVang-7-29-2025
iM-Best4 MC-Score Vanguard System: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 4.4%, and for the last 12 months is 4.6%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 9.3% and 18.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Best4 MC-Score Vanguard System gained -0.02% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $179,495 which includes $568 cash and excludes $00 spent on fees and slippage.
20-imc-spy-ief-7-29-2025
iM-Composite (SPY-IEF) Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -1.3%, and for the last 12 months is 3.9%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 9.3% and 18.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Composite (SPY-IEF) Timer gained 1.29% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $212,377 which includes $913 cash and excludes $7,786 spent on fees and slippage.
22-imc-gld-stk-bnd-7-29-2025
iM-Composite(Gold-Stocks-Bond) Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 26.2%, and for the last 12 months is 38.5%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 9.3% and 18.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Composite(Gold-Stocks-Bond) Timer gained -2.46% at a time when SPY gained 1.30%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $311,109 which includes $36 cash and excludes $9,190 spent on fees and slippage.
Posted in pmp SPY-SH

Leave a Reply

With reference to Section 202(a)(11)(D) of the Investment Advisers Act: We are Engineers and not Investment Advisers, read more ...
By the mere act of reading this page and navigating this site you acknowledge, agree to, and abide by the Terms of Use / Disclaimer