Home › pmp › pmp SPY-SH › iM-Best Reports – 1/9/2022

iM-Best Reports – 1/9/2022

Performance-wk-1-10-2023 Performance-mth-1-10-2023 Out of sample performance summary of our models for the past 1, 2, 4 and 13 week periods. The active active return indicates how the models over- or underperformed the benchmark ETF SPY. Also the YTD, and the 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year annualized returns are shown in the second table
23-enh-inflation-timer-1-10-2023
 iM-Inflation Attuned Multi-Model Market Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -1.9%, and for the last 12 months is 19.6%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -0.4% and -18.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Inflation Attuned Multi-Model Market Timer gained -3.01% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 3/24/2017 would have grown to $151,765,968 which includes -$3,640,393 cash and excludes $2,033,278 spent on fees and slippage.
30-im-fs-6040-1-10-2023
 iM-FlipSaver 60:40 | 20:80 – 2017: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 0.3%, and for the last 12 months is -13.2%. Over the same period the benchmark E60B40 performance was 0.0% and -15.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-FlipSaver 80:20 | 20:80 gained 0.20% at a time when SPY gained 0.05%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/16/2015 would have grown to $141,421 which includes $2,183 cash and excludes $2,673 spent on fees and slippage.
31-im-fs-7030-1-10-2023
 iM-FlipSaver 70:30 | 20:80 – 2017: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 0.3%, and for the last 12 months is -13.5%. Over the same period the benchmark E60B40 performance was 0.0% and -15.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-FlipSaver 70:30 | 20:80 gained 0.20% at a time when SPY gained 0.05%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/15/2015 would have grown to $145,427 which includes $2,335 cash and excludes $2,831 spent on fees and slippage.
32-im-fs-8020-1-10-2023
 iM-FlipSaver 80:20 | 20:80 – 2017: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 0.3%, and for the last 12 months is -13.9%. Over the same period the benchmark E60B40 performance was 0.0% and -15.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-FlipSaver 80:20 | 20:80 gained 0.20% at a time when SPY gained 0.05%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2017 would have grown to $149,274 which includes $2,525 cash and excludes $2,982 spent on fees and slippage.
18-5HedgeFundSelect-1-10-2023 18-1.5HedgeFundSelect-1-10-2023
 iM-5HedgeFundSelect: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 270.56% while the benchmark SPY gained 111.86% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-5HedgeFundSelect gained 0.90% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $25,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $92,640 which includes $2,056 cash and excludes $1,835 spent on fees and slippage.
10-iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect-1-10-2023 10-1.iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect-1-10-2023
 iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 147.26% while the benchmark SPY gained 111.86% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect gained 2.91% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $25,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $61,814 which includes $51 cash and excludes $1,183 spent on fees and slippage.
38-iM-Top5QQQSelect-1-10-202338-1.iM-Top5QQQSelect-1-10-2023
 iM-Top5(QQQ)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 441.84% while the benchmark SPY gained 111.86% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(QQQ)Select gained 0.54% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $541,839 which includes $2,687 cash and excludes $9,478 spent on fees and slippage.
37-iM-Top5XLBSelect-1-10-202337-1.iM-Top5XLBSelect-1-10-2023
 iM-Top5(XLB)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 150.88% while the benchmark SPY gained 111.86% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLB)Select gained -2.52% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $250,880 which includes $3,117 cash and excludes $9,139 spent on fees and slippage.
35-iM-Top5XLISelect-1-10-202335-1.iM-Top5XLISelect-1-10-2023
 iM-Top5(XLI)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 276.89% while the benchmark SPY gained 111.86% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLI)Select gained -0.76% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $376,887 which includes $934 cash and excludes $5,411 spent on fees and slippage.
27-iM-Top5XLKSelect-1-10-202327-1.iM-Top5XLKSelect-1-10-2023
 iM-Top5(XLK)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 395.11% while the benchmark SPY gained 111.86% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLK)Select gained 1.43% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $495,109 which includes $6,695 cash and excludes $1,738 spent on fees and slippage.
28-iM-Top5XLPSelect-1-10-202328-1.iM-Top5XLPSelect-1-10-2023
 iM-Top5(XLP)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 179.64% while the benchmark SPY gained 111.86% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLP)Select gained 0.29% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $279,638 which includes $1,454 cash and excludes $1,729 spent on fees and slippage.
33-iM-Top5XLVSelect-1-10-202333-1.iM-Top5XLVSelect-1-10-2023
 iM-Top5(XLV)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 408.49% while the benchmark SPY gained 111.86% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLV)Select gained 0.21% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $508,494 which includes $1,570 cash and excludes $8,865 spent on fees and slippage.
34-iM-Top5XLUSelect-1-10-202334-1.iM-Top5XLUSelect-1-10-2023
 iM-Top5(XLU)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 127.17% while the benchmark SPY gained 111.86% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLU)Select gained -0.98% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $227,173 which includes -$11 cash and excludes $11,025 spent on fees and slippage.
36-iM-Top5XLYSelect-1-10-202336-1.iM-Top5XLYSelect-1-10-2023
 iM-Top5(XLY)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 205.34% while the benchmark SPY gained 111.86% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLY)Select gained -0.44% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $305,335 which includes $1,498 cash and excludes $5,274 spent on fees and slippage.
39-Top5SeasonalCombo-1-10-2023
 iM-Seasonal Super-Sectors (Top5 combo) : Since inception, on 11/17/2020, the model gained 23.04% while the benchmark SPY gained 9.98% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Seasonal Super-Sectors (Top5 combo) gained -0.85% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 11/17/2020 would have grown to $123,042 which includes $1,826 cash and excludes $00 spent on fees and slippage.
17-DividendGrowth-1-10-2023
 iM-Dividend Growth Portfolio: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -0.2%, and for the last 12 months is -10.0%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -0.4% and -18.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Dividend Growth Portfolio gained -0.50% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $362,382 which includes $2,554 cash and excludes $9,027 spent on fees and slippage.
16-GoldMomentum-1-10-2023
 iM-Gold Momentum Timer (AU, NEM, SBSW): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 3.8%, and for the last 12 months is -22.5%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -0.4% and -18.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Gold Momentum Timer (AU, NEM, SBSW) gained 2.28% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $07 which includes $120,794 cash and excludes Gain to date spent on fees and slippage.
4-ModSumYieldCurve-1-10-2023
 iM-ModSum/YieldCurve Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 0.8%, and for the last 12 months is -13.6%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -0.4% and -18.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-PortSum/YieldCurve Timer gained 0.61% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/1/2016 would have grown to $254,172 which includes $1,553 cash and excludes $1,196 spent on fees and slippage.
1-SPY-SH-1-10-2023
 iM-Best(SPY-SH).R1: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 0.3%, and for the last 12 months is -24.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -0.4% and -18.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of Best(SPY-SH) gained 0.19% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2009 would have grown to $67,137 which includes $213 cash and excludes $2,437 spent on fees and slippage.
2-Combo3-1-10-2023
 iM-Combo3.R1: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 0.5%, and for the last 12 months is -11.2%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -0.4% and -18.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Combo3.R1 gained 0.32% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/3/2014 would have grown to $186,952 which includes $2,950 cash and excludes $8,056 spent on fees and slippage.
15-Combo5-1-10-2023
 iM-Combo5: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 0.6%, and for the last 12 months is -32.1%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -0.4% and -18.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Combo5 gained 0.44% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/22/2016 would have grown to $154,268 which includes -$581 cash and excludes $0 spent on fees and slippage.
8-VDIGXtrade-1-10-20238-1.VDIGXtrade-1-10-2023
 iM-Best10(VDIGX)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -0.2%, and for the last 12 months is -9.9%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -0.4% and -18.5% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 188.50% while the benchmark SPY gained 127.42% and VDIGX gained 134.62% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best10(VDIGX) gained -0.39% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $288,501 which includes $821 cash and excludes $4,445 spent on fees and slippage.
29-im6-cap-strg-1-10-2023
 iM 6-Stock Capital Strength Portfolio: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 0.9%, and for the last 12 months is 0.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -0.4% and -18.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM 6-Stock Capital Strength Portfolio gained 0.09% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 10/28/2016 would have grown to $218,179 which includes $2,714 cash and excludes $2,551 spent on fees and slippage.
7-USMVtrade-1-10-20237-1.USMVtrade-1-10-2023
 iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 0.4%, and for the last 12 months is 2.9%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -0.4% and -18.5% respectively. Since inception, on 6/30/2014, the model gained 170.02% while the benchmark SPY gained 127.42% and the ETF USMV gained 127.96% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader gained 0.69% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2014 would have grown to $270,016 which includes $1,475 cash and excludes $7,684 spent on fees and slippage.
13-MinVolUSMVInv-1-10-2023 13-1.MinVolUSMVInv-1-10-2023
 iM-Min Volatility(USMV) Investor (Tax Efficient): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -0.5%, and for the last 12 months is 21.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -0.4% and -18.5% respectively. Since inception, on 1/3/2013, the model gained 597.15% while the benchmark SPY gained 213.93% and the ETF USMV gained 213.93% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q1 gained -0.39% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/3/2013 would have grown to $697,146 which includes $3,201 cash and excludes $6,959 spent on fees and slippage.
5-bnd-mkt-trdr-1-10-2023
 iM-Bond Market Trader (High-Yield Bond or 10-yr Treasury Bond): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 0.8%, and for the last 12 months is -11.8%. Over the same period the benchmark BND performance was 0.5% and -12.7% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Bond Market Trader (High-Yield Bond or 10-yr Treasury Bond) gained 0.61% at a time when BND gained 0.35%. A starting capital of $10,000 at inception on 1/3/2000 would have grown to $133,960 which includes $846 cash and excludes $2,495 spent on fees and slippage.
4-ModSumYieldCurve-1-10-2023
 iM-ModSum/YieldCurve Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 0.8%, and for the last 12 months is -13.6%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -0.4% and -18.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-PortSum/YieldCurve Timer gained 0.61% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/1/2016 would have grown to $254,172 which includes $1,553 cash and excludes $1,196 spent on fees and slippage.
25-Best2MCsETF-1-10-2023
 iM-Best2 MC-Score ETF System: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 0.3%, and for the last 12 months is -10.1%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -0.4% and -18.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Best2 MC-Score ETF System gained 0.08% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $139,951 which includes $1,320 cash and excludes $2,232 spent on fees and slippage.
26-Best4MCsVang-1-10-2023
 iM-Best4 MC-Score Vanguard System: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 0.5%, and for the last 12 months is -10.5%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -0.4% and -18.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Best4 MC-Score Vanguard System gained 0.31% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $150,792 which includes $555 cash and excludes $00 spent on fees and slippage.
20-imc-spy-ief-1-10-2023
 iM-Composite (SPY-IEF) Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 0.8%, and for the last 12 months is -14.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -0.4% and -18.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Composite (SPY-IEF) Timer gained 0.61% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $171,362 which includes $1,276 cash and excludes $5,043 spent on fees and slippage.
22-imc-gld-stk-bnd-1-10-2023
 iM-Composite(Gold-Stocks-Bond) Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 0.8%, and for the last 12 months is -2.6%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was -0.4% and -18.5% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Composite(Gold-Stocks-Bond) Timer gained 1.44% at a time when SPY gained -0.15%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $173,926 which includes $36 cash and excludes $9,190 spent on fees and slippage.
Posted in pmp SPY-SH

Leave a Reply

With reference to Section 202(a)(11)(D) of the Investment Advisers Act: We are Engineers and not Investment Advisers, read more ...
By the mere act of reading this page and navigating this site you acknowledge, agree to, and abide by the Terms of Use / Disclaimer