Home › pmp › pmp SPY-SH › iM-Best Reports – 12/19/2016

iM-Best Reports – 12/19/2016

Performance-wk-12-20-2016 Performance-mth-12-20-2016 Out of sample performance summary of our models for the past 1, 2, 4 and 13 week periods. The active active return indicates how the models over- or underperformed the benchmark ETF SPY. Also the YTD, and the 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year annualized returns are shown in the second table
Fig-1.SPY-SH-12-20-2016
 iM-Best(SPY-SH).R1: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 7.3%, and for the last 12 months is 5.1%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.0% and 15.2% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of Best(SPY-SH) gained -0.32% at a time when SPY gained 0.27%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2009 would have grown to $466,382 which includes -$2,720 cash and excludes $15,358 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-2.Combo3-12-20-2016
 iM-Combo3.R1: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -3.9%, and for the last 12 months is -2.2%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.0% and 15.2% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Combo3.R1 gained 0.34% at a time when SPY gained 0.27%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/3/2014 would have grown to $127,111 which includes -$1,697 cash and excludes $3,054 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-15.Combo5-12-20-2016
 iM-Combo5: The model’s out of sample performance from inception is -1.0%. The benchmark SPY performance over the same period is 20.0%. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Combo5 gained 0.03% at a time when SPY gained 0.27%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/22/2016 would have grown to $99,034 which includes -$1,258 cash and excludes $330 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-14.Best8TaxEff-12-20-2016
 The iM-Best8(S&P500 Min Vol)Tax-Efficient The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -12.8%, and for the last 12 months is -13.2%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.0% and 15.2% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best8(S&P 500)Tax-Eff. gained -1.73% at a time when SPY gained 0.27%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2009 would have grown to $388,432 which includes $154,726 cash and excludes $7,837 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-8.VDIGXtrade-12-20-2016Fig-8.1.VDIGXtrade-12-20-2016
 iM-Best10(VDIGX)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 16.4%, and for the last 12 months is 19.6%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.0% and 15.2% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 46.77% while the benchmark SPY gained 21.30% and the ETF VDIGX gained 19.31% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best10(VDIGX) gained -0.12% at a time when SPY gained 0.27%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $146,767 which includes $363 cash and excludes $1,491 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-19.Best2MCsETF-12-20-2016
 iM-Best2 MC-Score ETF System: The model’s out of sample performance from inception is -2.8%. The benchmark SPY performance over the same period is 8.8%. Over the previous week the market value of iM-BESTOGA-3 gained 0.13% at a time when SPY gained 0.27%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/3/2014 would have grown to $55 which includes $105 cash and excludes Gain to date spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-4.Bestoga3-12-20-2016
 iM-BESTOGA-3: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 10.3%, and for the last 12 months is 11.9%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.0% and 15.2% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-BESTOGA-3 gained 0.20% at a time when SPY gained 0.27%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/3/2014 would have grown to $202,716 which includes $20,366 cash and excludes $767 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-18.HiD-LoV-12-20-2016
 iM-Best7(HiD-LoV): The model’s out of sample performance from inception is 5.4%. The benchmark SPY performance over the same period is 8.8%. Over the previous week the market value of iM-BESTOGA-3 gained 0.17% at a time when SPY gained 0.27%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 2/3/2014 would have grown to $105,356 which includes $382 cash and excludes $271 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-16.ShortRSL3000-12-20-2016
 iM-Best10(Short Russell3000): The model’s performance YTD is -40.4%, and for the last 12 months is -39.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.0% and 15.2% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best10(Short Russell3000) gained -1.95% at a time when SPY gained 0.27%. Over the period 2/3/2014 to 12/19/2016 the starting capital of $100,000 would have grown to $8,471 which includes $17,263 cash and excludes $1,602 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-17.BestogaX5-12-20-2016
 iM-BestogaX5-System: The model’s out of sample performance from inception is -0.9%. The benchmark SPY performance over the same period is 12.8%. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best8(S&P 500)Tax-Eff. gained -0.52% at a time when SPY gained 0.27%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2009 would have grown to $99,106 which includes $20,171 cash and excludes $336 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-7.USMVtrade-12-20-2016Fig-7.1.USMVtrade-12-20-2016
 iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 9.7%, and for the last 12 months is 11.7%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.0% and 15.2% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 39.92% while the benchmark SPY gained 21.30% and the ETF USMV gained 28.65% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader gained 0.40% at a time when SPY gained 0.27%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $139,920 which includes $336 cash and excludes $2,697 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-9.USMVQ1-12-20-2016 Fig-9.1.USMVQ1-12-20-2016
 iM-Best12(USMV)Q1-Investor: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 21.6%, and for the last 12 months is 23.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.0% and 15.2% respectively. Since inception, on 1/5/2015, the model gained 26.84% while the benchmark SPY gained 16.57% and the ETF USMV gained 18.15% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q1 gained 0.10% at a time when SPY gained 0.27%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2015 would have grown to $126,842 which includes $78 cash and excludes $598 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-10.USMVQ2-12-20-2016 Fig-10.1.USMVQ2-12-20-2016
 iM-Best12(USMV)Q2-Investor: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 15.9%, and for the last 12 months is 18.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.0% and 15.2% respectively. Since inception, on 3/31/2015, the model gained 15.27% while the benchmark SPY gained 12.41% and the ETF USMV gained 14.11% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q2 gained -0.04% at a time when SPY gained 0.27%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 3/31/2015 would have grown to $115,272 which includes $235 cash and excludes $515 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-5.USMVQ3-12-20-2016 Fig-5.1.USMVQ3-12-20-2016
 iM-Best12(USMV)Q3-Investor: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 32.6%, and for the last 12 months is 34.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.0% and 15.2% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 55.47% while the benchmark SPY gained 21.30% and the ETF USMV gained 28.65% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q3 gained 0.59% at a time when SPY gained 0.27%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $155,467 which includes -$131 cash and excludes $865 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-6.USMVQ4-12-20-2016Fig-6.1.USMVQ4-12-20-2016
 iM-Best12(USMV)Q4-Investor: Since inception, on 9/30/2014, the model gained 38.54% while the benchmark SPY gained 19.69% and the ETF USMV gained 26.87% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q4 gained -0.47% at a time when SPY gained 0.27%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 9/30/2014 would have grown to $138,544 which includes $15 cash and excludes $713 spent on fees and slippage.
Fig-10.USMV-Portfolio-vs-SPY-12-20-2016
 Average Performance of iM-Best12(USMV)Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4-Investor resulted in an excess return of 29.96% over SPY. (see iM-USMV Investor Portfolio)
Fig-3.Short-12-20-2016
 iM-Best(Short): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -7.9%, and for the last 12 months is -7.6%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.0% and 15.2% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best(Short) gained 1.31% at a time when SPY gained 0.27%. Over the period 1/2/2009 to 12/19/2016 the starting capital of $100,000 would have grown to $96,447 which includes $134,461 cash and excludes $20,947 spent on fees and slippage.
Posted in pmp SPY-SH

Leave a Reply

With reference to Section 202(a)(11)(D) of the Investment Advisers Act: We are Engineers and not Investment Advisers, read more ...
By the mere act of reading this page and navigating this site you acknowledge, agree to, and abide by the Terms of Use / Disclaimer