 |
Out of sample performance summary of our models for the past 1, 2, 4 and 13 week periods. The active active return indicates how the models over- or underperformed the benchmark ETF SPY. Also the YTD, and the 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year annualized returns are shown in the second table |
|
|
iM-Inflation Attuned Multi-Model Market Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 10.6%, and for the last 12 months is 11.9%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.3% and 16.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Inflation Attuned Multi-Model Market Timer gained 1.22% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 3/24/2017 would have grown to $169,321,075 which includes $4,109,301 cash and excludes $4,103,439 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-Conference Board LEIg Timer: The model’s performance YTD is 14.3%, and for the last 12 months is 7.3%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 20.1% and 9.4% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Conference Board LEIg Timer gained 0.47% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 4/5/2017 would have grown to $763,775 which includes $9,534 cash and excludes $769 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-FlipSaver 60:40 | 20:80 – 2017: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 8.3%, and for the last 12 months is 8.4%. Over the same period the benchmark E60B40 performance was 7.1% and 9.0% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-FlipSaver 80:20 | 20:80 gained -0.74% at a time when SPY gained -0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/16/2015 would have grown to $194,212 which includes $374 cash and excludes $5,614 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-FlipSaver 70:30 | 20:80 – 2017: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 9.8%, and for the last 12 months is 9.9%. Over the same period the benchmark E60B40 performance was 7.1% and 9.0% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-FlipSaver 70:30 | 20:80 gained -0.96% at a time when SPY gained -0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/15/2015 would have grown to $205,062 which includes $830 cash and excludes $5,886 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-FlipSaver 80:20 | 20:80 – 2017: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 11.3%, and for the last 12 months is 11.4%. Over the same period the benchmark E60B40 performance was 7.1% and 9.0% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-FlipSaver 80:20 | 20:80 gained -1.16% at a time when SPY gained -0.70%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/2/2017 would have grown to $216,081 which includes $60 cash and excludes $6,150 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-5HedgeFundSelect: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 930.37% while the benchmark SPY gained 347.06% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-5HedgeFundSelect gained -4.50% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $25,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $257,593 which includes $10,739 cash and excludes $3,606 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 691.54% while the benchmark SPY gained 347.06% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-10LargeHedgeFundSelect gained -4.49% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $25,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $187,435 which includes -$9,730 cash and excludes $2,084 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-Top5(QQQ)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 1928.89% while the benchmark SPY gained 347.06% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(QQQ)Select gained 1.60% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $2,028,890 which includes -$27,079 cash and excludes $35,396 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-Top5(XLB)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 287.45% while the benchmark SPY gained 347.06% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLB)Select gained 3.02% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $387,445 which includes $3,848 cash and excludes $18,262 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-Top5(XLI)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 437.57% while the benchmark SPY gained 347.06% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLI)Select gained 2.91% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $537,574 which includes $78 cash and excludes $10,234 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-Top5(XLK)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 1046.08% while the benchmark SPY gained 347.06% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLK)Select gained -0.70% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $1,146,085 which includes $457 cash and excludes $3,952 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-Top5(XLP)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 256.82% while the benchmark SPY gained 347.06% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLP)Select gained 5.09% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $356,815 which includes -$986 cash and excludes $3,653 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-Top5(XLV)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 410.99% while the benchmark SPY gained 347.06% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLV)Select gained 3.27% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $510,990 which includes $1,243 cash and excludes $20,953 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-Top5(XLU)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 201.46% while the benchmark SPY gained 347.06% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLU)Select gained 0.04% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $301,458 which includes $3,811 cash and excludes $19,252 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-Top5(XLY)Select: Since inception, on 1/5/2016, the model gained 352.75% while the benchmark SPY gained 347.06% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Top5(XLY)Select gained 2.96% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/5/2016 would have grown to $452,753 which includes $480 cash and excludes $8,975 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-Seasonal Super-Sectors (Top5 combo) : Since inception, on 11/17/2020, the model gained 152.63% while the benchmark SPY gained 132.07% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Seasonal Super-Sectors (Top5 combo) gained 1.49% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 11/17/2020 would have grown to $252,632 which includes $939 cash and excludes $00 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-Dividend Growth Portfolio: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 30.1%, and for the last 12 months is 28.9%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.3% and 16.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Dividend Growth Portfolio gained 2.03% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $692,884 which includes $1,552 cash and excludes $16,095 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-Gold Momentum Timer (AU, NEM, SBSW): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -10.7%, and for the last 12 months is 11.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.3% and 16.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Gold Momentum Timer (AU, NEM, SBSW) gained -1.89% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to -$27,095 which includes $306,772 cash and excludes Gain to date spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-ModSum/YieldCurve Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 9.7%, and for the last 12 months is 9.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.3% and 16.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-PortSum/YieldCurve Timer gained -1.49% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/1/2016 would have grown to $420,175 which includes $144 cash and excludes $2,605 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-Best10(VDIGX)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 3.0%, and for the last 12 months is 6.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.3% and 16.6% respectively. Since inception, on 7/1/2014, the model gained 283.69% while the benchmark SPY gained 379.90% and VDIGX gained -100.00% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best10(VDIGX) gained 3.62% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 7/1/2014 would have grown to $383,690 which includes $1,093 cash and excludes $5,836 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM 6-Stock Capital Strength Portfolio: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 30.6%, and for the last 12 months is 33.6%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.3% and 16.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM 6-Stock Capital Strength Portfolio gained 3.86% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 10/28/2016 would have grown to $335,470 which includes $2,680 cash and excludes $4,732 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 20.1%, and for the last 12 months is 23.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.3% and 16.6% respectively. Since inception, on 6/30/2014, the model gained 412.92% while the benchmark SPY gained 379.90% and the ETF USMV gained -100.00% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)-Trader gained -0.94% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2014 would have grown to $512,920 which includes $1,734 cash and excludes $9,286 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-Min Volatility(USMV) Investor (Tax Efficient): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 23.3%, and for the last 12 months is 24.5%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.3% and 16.6% respectively. Since inception, on 1/3/2013, the model gained 1367.78% while the benchmark SPY gained 562.46% and the ETF USMV gained -100.00% over the same period. Over the previous week the market value of iM-Best12(USMV)Q1 gained 2.15% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/3/2013 would have grown to $1,467,783 which includes $166 cash and excludes $18,626 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-Bond Market Trader (High-Yield Bond or 10-yr Treasury Bond): The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -2.3%, and for the last 12 months is -2.6%. Over the same period the benchmark BND performance was -1.8% and -1.9% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Bond Market Trader (High-Yield Bond or 10-yr Treasury Bond) gained 0.71% at a time when BND gained 0.50%. A starting capital of $10,000 at inception on 1/3/2000 would have grown to $145,719 which includes $2,492 cash and excludes $2,977 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-ModSum/YieldCurve Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 9.7%, and for the last 12 months is 9.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.3% and 16.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of iM-PortSum/YieldCurve Timer gained -1.49% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 1/1/2016 would have grown to $420,175 which includes $144 cash and excludes $2,605 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-Best2 MC-Score ETF System: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 11.5%, and for the last 12 months is 10.8%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.3% and 16.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Best2 MC-Score ETF System gained 1.86% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $209,852 which includes $2,974 cash and excludes $5,779 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-Best4 MC-Score Vanguard System: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 3.8%, and for the last 12 months is 1.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.3% and 16.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Best4 MC-Score Vanguard System gained 0.48% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $189,801 which includes $8,854 cash and excludes $00 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-Composite (SPY-IEF) Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is 14.6%, and for the last 12 months is 14.2%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.3% and 16.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Composite (SPY-IEF) Timer gained -1.48% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $248,196 which includes $2,156 cash and excludes $8,651 spent on fees and slippage. |
|
|
iM-Composite(Gold-Stocks-Bond) Timer: The model’s out of sample performance YTD is -9.1%, and for the last 12 months is -7.4%. Over the same period the benchmark SPY performance was 13.3% and 16.6% respectively. Over the previous week the market value of the iM-Composite(Gold-Stocks-Bond) Timer gained -0.83% at a time when SPY gained -1.49%. A starting capital of $100,000 at inception on 6/30/2016 would have grown to $367,036 which includes -$556 cash and excludes $11,611 spent on fees and slippage. |