Updated: Timing the Stock Market with the Inflation Rate

  • Stocks usually perform poorly when inflation is on the rise. Using the inflation rate, we developed a market timer according to two simple rules.
  • Switching according to the Timer signals between the S&P500 with dividends and a money-market fund would have provided from Aug-1953 to end of Jan-2016 and annualized return of 12.69%.
  • Over the same period buy-and-hold of the S&P500 with dividends showed an annualized return of 10.08%, producing about a quarter of the total return of the Timer model.

The inflation rate (INF) is the 12-month rate of change of the consumer price index (CPI). The CPI is provided by the Department of Labor Statistics usually during the third week after the month to which it refers.

Rules

  • Sell Rule for stocks:
    • INF  >  6-mo SMA(INF) + 0.75% and INF>2
    • Sell when the inflation rate exceeds its 6-month moving average plus 0.75% and also exceeds 2.0%
  • Buy Rule for stocks:
    • INF  <  6-mo SMA(INF) – 0.20%
    • Buy when the inflation rate becomes less than its 6-month moving average minus 0.20%.

Performance

We calculated a hypothetical fund SPY* based on the performance of the S&P 500 with dividends reinvested by splicing the data from the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) from 1993 to 2016, the Vanguard 500 Index Fund (VFINX) from 1980 to 1993, and before that from 1953 to 1980 daily data of the S&P 500 with monthly dividends taken from the Shiller CAPE data.

We simulated a hypothetical money market fund SHV* with the Federal Funds Rate from 1953 to 2007 and thereafter spliced the iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) to it.

All trading is assumed to occur on the first trading day of the week after the 20th day of the month when CPI is known for the preceding month. A backtest of this model starting in 1953 provided the first buy signal for stocks on Aug-24-1953.

Over the period Aug-24-1953 to Jan-30-2017 the model, switching between SPY* and SHV*, showed an annualized return of 12.69% with a maximum drawdown of -39% in 2002.  Buy-and-hold SPY* gave an annualized return of 10.08% with a maximum drawdown of -55% in 2009 (Figure-1).

Over the period 1/3/2000 to Jan-30-2017 the model showed an annualized return of 9.01% with a maximum drawdown of -39% in 2002.  Buy-and-hold SPY* gave an annualized return of 4.58% with a maximum drawdown of -55% in 2009 (Figure-2).

There were 15 periods from 1953 to 2016 when the inflation rate signaled to be in or out of the stock market. They are listed in the Appendix and are also shown by the vertical bars in Figure-3. Note that the Inflation Timer signaled to be out of the stock market during the 1987 market collapse.

width="640"/(click to enlarge)

width="640"/(click to enlarge)

width="640"/(click to enlarge)

Conclusion

Higher returns could have been achieved by using a longer term bond fund instead of a money-market fund. However, we wanted to show the most conservative performance from this model, which over the period 1953 to 2017 provided 4.44 times the total return of what a constant investment in the stock market would have produced.

The model is simple to construct, but can also be followed live at ImarketSignals.com. Heeding the monthly signals from the Inflation Timer should provide insurance against major stock market declines and improve investment performance.

Appendix

 

buy stocks 08/24/1953
buy bonds 08/20/1956
buy stocks 08/26/1957
buy bonds 02/26/1968
buy stocks 09/21/1970
buy bonds 04/23/1973
buy stocks 03/24/1975
buy bonds 04/25/1977
buy stocks 11/21/1977
buy bonds 08/21/1978
buy stocks 08/25/1980
buy bonds 01/23/1984
buy stocks 07/23/1984
buy bonds 04/20/1987
buy stocks 02/22/1988
buy bonds 10/22/1990
buy stocks 02/25/1991
buy bonds 04/24/2000
buy stocks 04/23/2001
buy bonds 06/21/2004
buy stocks 10/25/2004
buy bonds 10/24/2005
buy stocks 01/23/2006
buy bonds 11/26/2007
buy stocks 11/24/2008
buy bonds 01/25/2010
buy stocks 06/21/2010
buy bonds 04/25/2011
buy stocks 12/27/2011
buy bonds 01/23/2017

 

 

Posted in blogs, featured, Publish

Leave a Reply

With reference to Section 202(a)(11)(D) of the Investment Advisers Act: We are Engineers and not Investment Advisers, read more ...
By the mere act of reading this page and navigating this site you acknowledge, agree to, and abide by the Terms of Use / Disclaimer
Share This